Category: Books / Videos

Categories
Books / Videos

A Natural New Testament

A friend sent me a link to A Natural New Testament translated by Frank Daniels and originally released in 1995. I have included some of his commentary and some comparative scripture. As far as I can tell, this is not in print form but is only available on-line. If there is a print version please contact me. You can go to this link and scroll down on the page to A Natural New Testament.

The present translation intends to discover the authors’ intent in writing their narratives, letters, and expositions – and to make these more apparent in English. Consequently, certain terms that are normally left untranslated (or translated into Latin) appear translated in this edition. “Christ” is rendered “Anointed One,” and whenever the reader passes over the term, it ought to convey the full force of the Messiah that had been promised to the Jews. There are no apostles, angels, deacons or ministers, bishops, devils, demons, or preachers in this edition; rather, the reader will find envoys (people who are sent out as representatives), messengers, servants, overseers, accusers, spirit beings, and heralds. The term “church” has also been dropped in favor of “assembly,” which is the meaning of the Greek word. Here, this translator has followed certain former translators who refused to retain the “old ecclesiastical words.”

It is this translator’s effort to provide a translation as free of tradition as possible, in the hopes that this will bring the reader closer to the paradigm of the original followers of Jesus. And while every translator or group of translators believes that their own translation is most accurate, one thing must be noted:


This is a translation into English of a set of documents that were written over 1900 years ago in Greek. In many cases, Greek was a second language to the authors, who existed under entirely different conditions than we do today. While they saw clearly what were their own customs and patterns of thought, we today often have trouble distinguishing between the intent of the author and our own preconceived notions. Therefore, we must carefully distinguish between our own opinions and the facts. Every translation follows the opinions of the translators and is therefore an opinion. This is a translation, an opinion, a mere human viewpoint of an ordinary human being. The value of this translation rests not in its authoritative nature but in the examination of the different paradigm which it may be found to contain.

Frank Daniels, A Natural New Testament

The following comparison is from Ephesians 4.

And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers, for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ, till we all come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ; that we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting, but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into Him who is the head—Christ—from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by what every joint supplies, according to the effective working by which every part does its share, causes growth of the body for the edifying of itself in love.

New King James Version

And indeed, he gave the envoys, and the prophets, and the good messengers, and the shepherds and teachers, for the restoration of the holy ones to the point of work of service, for the construction of the Anointed One’s body, until all of us should reach the point of the unity of the faith and the recognition of God’s son – until we should reach a measure of stature of the fullness of the Anointed One, so that we would no longer be babies, being carried about by every wind of teaching (in the trickery of human beings, in craftiness) to the system of deceit. But, being truthful in love, we should grow up into him in all things. He is the head, the Anointed One, from whom all the body is made to grow to the point of its construction in love – being firmly joined and knit together through every supplying ligament, according to the working (in measure) of every single part.


A Natural New Testament
Categories
Books / Videos

Conforming to His Image

This is the third excerpt from Milt Rodriguez’s book The Community Life of God. You can find the links to the other excerpts here. I have done some slight editing to this excerpt.

“Because those whom He foreknew, He also predestinated to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the Firstborn among many brothers.” Rom. 8:29

Today, we hear a lot about being like Jesus. Preachers, and consequently believers, talk about Christ-likeness. As individual believers we are told that this is our goal: to be like Christ.

Actually, this is what most “discipleship” programs are all about. We are here to “make disciples,” whatever that means. After all, it’s part of the “great commission” (Matt. 28: 19, 20) to make disciples. We have interpreted this to mean that we are supposed to take individual believers and help them to be like Christ. Usually we do this by teaching them doctrine, how to study the Bible, how to “pray,” how to serve God on the mission field, and basically how to be a good Christian.

But where in the scripture does it talk about becoming like Christ? Where did we get this idea? The only thing that I can see is the passages that deal with being conformed to His image. Perhaps we have paraphrased that to be “becoming like Christ.” If that is so, and I believe it is, then we must look at the context of each of those passages. In what context are we to be conformed to His image?

If you read the passages that have to do with being conformed to His image, you will quickly see that the context is always corporate (Rom. 8:28-20; Rom. 12: 1-5; II Cor. 3:18; Col. 3:10, 11). It is we who are being conformed to His image. It is us together, the Body, that is to look like Him. You can never be like Jesus. But She can! I am referring to that beautiful woman, the bride of Christ, who is destined to be His wife (Rev. 21:9).

If you will read the scriptures carefully, especially the New Testament, from this perspective, it will become a new book to you. You will begin to see the proper perspective for the testimony. Things will make more sense when you read it with the “corporate view.” That’s because God’s image is community. So, naturally, the process of being conformed to that image must be communal.

The fact is that we are already one. We are in Christ and He is in us. This makes us one (John 17:22, 23). How could we all be “in Christ” and yet not be one? The problem is not our oneness, the problem is the practical expression of that oneness. That comes through us walking it out together day by day. That comes through us developing a “body consciousness.”

It comes through a revelation of the corporate nature of the church. It comes through developing a lifestyle of community and not one of individualism and independence. And it comes by us sharing our lives with one another and taking care of one another. In a word, this is family, but family in the true sense of the word. Not family as we have seen it in this world, but family as a genuine expression of the community life of God.

Being conformed to His image (or becoming like Christ) is a corporate matter. We are transformed together by the renewing of our minds (Rom. 12:1-5). This renewal happens because we are learning to think as a body instead of just a bunch of individuals. We are “learning” Christ. We are learning and experiencing the oneness of the Head and Body. We are learning to think and function as the One New Man (see Col. 3:9-11).

This is true discipleship. It’s not a matter of being placed into a program of individual training of Bible study, prayer evangelism, and character development. Rather, it is the life transformation process of being practically conformed into His image. This is the outflowing of His community life. It is the fleshing out of the fellowship of the Godhead.

Therefore, I can only conclude from this that all true “discipleship” happens in a corporate context. We learn together how to live by Christ. This is something that we all learn in the daily fires of organic church life.

Milt Rodriguez, The Community Life of God
Categories
Books / Videos

What Does God Eat?

This is the second excerpt from Milt Rodriguez’s book The Community Life of God. You can find the links to the other excerpts here.

The main activity of the tabernacle is the bringing of offerings to God. The offering is a “present” or gift to God. The Bible tells us that the offerings are food for God (Numbers 28:2). Have we ever thought of it in this way? We come to God to get fed. We know that He is our life supply and the Bread of Life (John 6). But have we ever had the thought that God is hungry as well? Of course, I am speaking spiritually here. But God does want to eat! This is the deeper meaning behind the offerings. The offerings are to provide food for God. But what does God like to eat? Actually there is only one thing. His tastes are very specific.

There is a principle that is well known among Bible teachers and theologians. It’s called the principle of “first mention.” What it means is that the first time something is mentioned in the Bible, that incident will give you the purest meaning behind the whole subject throughout the rest of the scriptures. If we want to understand offerings, we need to look at the first offering.

The first offering was with Cain and Abel. Cain had a garden and he brought an offering to the Lord from his produce. Abel tended sheep and brought one of the young lambs to the Lord. Why did God accept Abel’s offering and not Cain’s? It’s because Cain brought the “fruit” of his own labors. Abel brought a pure, innocent lamb. Cain brought his own works; Abel brought a picture of Christ. Do you see what kind of offering satisfies God? There is only one kind of food He likes …….Christ!

The Church has two main purposes: to express Christ visibly to the world, and to bring food to God. The tent of meeting is the gathering of believers. When we come together what kind of offering do we bring to God? The only food He is satisfied with is His only Son. Is that the food that we are bringing? Most of you may say that you never really bring anything to the meetings. If that is the case, then you are missing the purpose of the gatherings. However, just bringing anything to the meeting is not enough. God wants to be fed Christ.

If we are experiencing Christ on a daily basis, if we are fellowshipping with Him in our spirits and touching Him in the other realm, if we are seeking Him in the scriptures and expecting Him to give us revelation, then we will have a sweet smelling offering (present) to give to Him. We will bring an acceptable offering, the only acceptable offering which is Christ.

Milt Rodriguez, The Community Life of God
Categories
Books / Videos

The Community Life of God

This enlightening book by Milt Rodriguez will change your life; it has become one of my favorites. This is a great resource for group study, being only 200 pages with short chapters. I hope you enjoy this book as much as I did. I plan on posting 2 or 3 excerpts…yes, it’s that good! Unfortunately, the website in the book isn’t linked anymore and his email isn’t active. There is one website still active and it’s a useful tool for those interested in Organic Church. See here.

You do not realize how deep this individualistic mindset really goes. You still have no idea how firmly rooted this is in your mind. It effects the way that you view God, yourself, your friends and family, and the world. And it also effects the way that you view and interpret the holy scriptures, the Bible.

When you open your Bible and begin to read, you immediately begin to interpret everything through the filter of your individualistic mind. You automatically assume that the scriptures were written to you as an individual so you apply them that way. But that is not reality. The truth is that most of the scriptures were not written to the individual.

Most of the New Testament was written to corporate entities. These were communal expressions of the Body of Christ in different localities or cities. I’m trying not to use the word “church” here because of the horrendous abuse of that term. For example, the letter to the Colossians was not written to you as an individual. It was written to the community of believers in the city of Colossae. The context for this letter is the community life. You cannot superimpose your individualistic mindset and lifestyle upon this letter. It just won’t fit.

It’s very difficult to really understand this letter unless you are experiencing the community life with a group of believers. You will have a tendency to always bring back the meaning of this letter and relate it to your own individual walk with God. But this letter is not about that. This letter is about the centrality, supremacy, and preeminence of Christ. That is, “Christ in you, the hope of glory.” Now, please pay attention very carefully.

When you just read my quotation of that verse in Colossians you immediately took that verse and applied it to you as an individual. “Christ in me, the hope of glory.” But that’s not what that verse says! It says, “Christ in you…” but that word “you” is plural, not singular! Paul is speaking to the church in Colossae and is telling them about a secret, a mystery which has been hidden for ages. But this mystery has now been made known to His saints. This mystery is Christ in all of you. In other words, Christ lives in His Body! Christ lives in you all.

Of course, it’s also true that Christ lives in you as an individual. But that is not what Paul is talking about here. He is talking about God’s mysterious purpose being fulfilled by a communal body that contains and expresses the life of His Son. This is just one example of how we take the scriptures and interpret and apply them to us as individuals. We are constantly doing this without even being aware of it. This is what I call the individualistic mind. We very rarely think in terms of the community. Yet that is exactly how we need to think in order to understand the scriptures. The scriptures, after all, were written by a God who is community. Only a renewing of our minds brought about by a constant contact with our indwelling Lord can bring about a change.

We do this with everything. We see everything through our “filters” of individualism. We desperately need to ask God to open our eyes to see the way He sees. We need to see from His perspective. We need to see from His viewpoint. That viewpoint is community. We need to have a revelation of God’s eternal purpose, and then see and understand everything according to that purpose. That purpose is the motivation behind everything God says and does. He is always working to fulfill this purpose in and through us (see Rom. 8:28-30).

When we see the scriptures only from an individual viewpoint, something very damaging happens. We place ourselves under the law, and the resulting condemnation and guilt. When we apply the scriptures to ourselves individually, then we simply can’t measure up to what God wants and we come under condemnation. Let me give you an example from the direct words of our Lord.

Matthew, chapters 5, 6, and 7 are normally referred to as the Sermon on the Mount. But after reading this section of Matthew, who would not feel totally inadequate? Why? Because as an individual, you are totally inadequate to live the kind of life described in these chapters. But we miss the point. In these chapters, and in many other places in the gospels, Jesus is describing a people. He is giving the description of a kingdom of people, of a new race, one new man. This passage can only be understood from the communal perspective. When you take it individually, it becomes law and results in condemnation. But this is a description of a corporate man who contains the life of Christ, the only one who can fulfill the law! The law is fulfilled by God’s eternal, divine, community life, not by an individual.

Another example of our mistaken viewpoint is in Ephesians 6:10-18 concerning the armor of God. Remember that this letter was written to a church; actually, it was written to several churches in Asia Minor. Paul was not asking individuals to put on the armor of God, He was asking the Church. The bride, the body of Christ puts on this armor. Not you as an individual. You could never measure up to this as an individual. And what is this armor? Truth, righteousness, peace, faith, salvation, and the word of God. Who is all of those things, dear reader? That’s right, it’s Christ Himself! The Church is to put on Christ as her only armor and protection.

We desperately need to see everything from His viewpoint. We need to see as He sees; we need to think as He thinks. And we need to see all of the scriptures in relationship to His eternal purpose to have a corporate image (or man) who will express the life of His Son. This is the central thought of God throughout the whole Bible. If we miss this, we miss the main point of everything.

Milt Rodriguez, The Community Life of God
Categories
Books / Videos

The Vast New Covenant Transition

Authors George Davis and Michael Clark have a chapter in this book called Not Forsaking the Assembly, a phrase from Hebrews 10 which has been used disparagingly toward those who remove themselves from corporate church. I have posted a segment from that chapter below and it’s well worth the read. You can get a free download here.

What is new and living about people meeting in earthly sanctuaries, all facing a speaker’s platform in total passivity until a dominate leader looks down upon them from his pulpit and directs them to move, pray, sing or pay? Is this what Jesus consecrated for us to walk in? What is new and living about churches with earthly structures with their presiding priests and pastors? Even the pagans order their temples after this pattern. Is this what Jesus died for–to put a new patch on an old, worn out religious garment? Are we to enter through the veil of His torn flesh so we can sit passively on a pew for seventy years and then die? Is this what it means to assemble in that new and living way? Will our tombstone in the church yard read, “Here lies Joe. He was faithful to assemble in the old covenant way for seventy years and his pastor was proud of him”?

If it is not new and living it is not a New Covenant assembly, regardless of how many people are gathered under one roof. The epistle to the Hebrews is a warning and an exhortation. Its author repeatedly warns that those who draw back from this heavenly way to return to the old religious traditions risk failing to enter into the fullness of God’s intention. The question is, do we have ears to hear this warning?

It’s clear from this epistle that the early Jewish believers were dividing into two camps. Some were forsaking assembling in this new and heavenly way and were turning back to the earthly forms of the old religious order, refusing to heed the high calling of the sons of God. They were forsaking the assembling together as His living body, just as surely as unbelieving Israel at Kadesh Barnea grieved God and did not go in and inherit the land of promise.

Those who refuse the new and living way by turning back to dead religious forms are forsaking the general assembly and church of the firstborn. Those who refuse to go on in this heavenly way and return to sitting mutely on a pew are the ones who are forsaking the proper assembly. The author of Hebrews later tells us of our heavenly calling and assembly, which should not be forsaken.

George Davis and Michael Clark, The Vast New Covenant Transition
Categories
Books / Videos

One Body in Christ

This is a beautiful and concise work from Kokichi Kurosaki (1886-1970). It’s interesting to hear his perspective of western religion’s departure from one loving community to the sectarian institution it has become. You can read this, and other works free, from the website awildernessvoice.com. Here is an excerpt below.

This koinonia–living in fellowship with God and Christ, having access to God and meeting Him in love and faith–is the real Ekklesia. In such experience of life, Christians will meet together, worship God together, help one another and do various good works in cooperation. As is natural in human society so in the Ekklesia, there will be division of labor according to the varieties of gifts (I Cor. 12:27-28). Everything will be controlled by the Head, Christ and each member will do his own part in obedience to the will of the Head. No human institutions, rituals or ceremonies are necessary to realize this. The Ekklesia cannot be formed by human knowledge and human activities. Indeed, it was of these products that the tower of Babel was built. The institutional church may have some outward likeness to the Ekklesia, but spiritual fellowship with God and Christ is more stifled than helped by the formalities of the church.

The legal unity of human organization, which is so often governed by men appointed by human methods is substitute for spiritual unity. By its very nature–being an institution–the organized church is prone to become fleshly rather than spiritual. Also, the existing sectarianism is itself a proof of fleshly-mindedness. “For while there is jealousy and strife among you, are you not of the flesh and behaving like ordinary men?” (I Cor. 3:3). The Ekklesia, on the other hand, is a product of the Spirit. It is, therefore, absolutely necessary that spiritual means be employed in its government and edification.

If we do not give the rightful preeminence to koinonia with God through Christ as the center of Christian faith we cannot but fail, for there are only two courses before us. Aside from secular atheism and the materialistic concept, if we do not find satisfaction through communion with God–for which we were created–then, invariably, we will try to find reality and satisfaction in the “Churchianity” of institution, forms and doctrines. Lacking spiritual “life,” we turn to “religion”–the lifeless corpse.

Kokichi Kurosaki, One Body of Christ
Categories
Books / Videos

The Great Ecclesiastical Conspiracy

This work by George Davis and Michael Clark is very informative, easy to read and well worth the time. It’s only about 100 pages and can be downloaded free at awildernessvoice.com. How and why did words like church, apostle, deacon, bishop, priest, pastor, obey, submit and many others enter our vocabulary and distort the very essence of Christianity? An excerpt is below.

Because the true church is relational, not institutional, it makes sense only in a social context, a family context. In every truly healthy family, there is second and third generation communion. You have the grandchildren, the parents, and the grandparents. In that context, the grandparents are the elders. They possess the wisdom of years and if godly, are in a position to teach by their words and example as no other family member can. Satan has done all he can possibly do to destroy the very concept of family, and to encourage the young in disrespect for the elderly, ignoring their counsel. Thus, we have witnessed the breakdown of the family and the church. The church is a family. It began in the heart of a loving Father who sent his only Son to bring many sons to glory. Oh, what manner of love the father has bestowed upon us that we should be called the sons of God!

Paul wrote to Timothy, telling how he should relate to the elderly (presbuteros) in the family of God:

Rebuke not an elder, (presbuteros) but intreat him as a father; and the younger men as brethren; The elder (presbuteros) women as mothers; the younger as sisters, with all purity. (1 Timothy 5:1-2)

The context of this scripture is completely relational, not institutional, and makes sense only in a family context. There is the mention of father, mothers, sisters and brethren. This sounds like a family to us. In the Greek, presbuteros is used for both old men and old women. In an attempt to institutionalize, all of these dear family terms became offices in the papal church. And since they could not recognize any title without ordination, everything that was once relational and family was displaced, and all but lost in the institution. Leadership gradually became more and more hierarchical until the supreme leader of this fallen church bore both the temporal and spiritual swords, sitting on a luxurious throne in extravagant robes wielding the kingly scepter of power and rule. Such men have bequeathed to us much that is called Christian leadership today.

I (Michael) am reminded of a story that a brother in Christ told me. One day a pair of Mormon missionaries came to his door and they introduced themselves as Elder Jones and Elder Smith (not their real names). My friend said that the oldest one could not have been more than twenty years old. Finally my friend, who was much older than them, asked, “Elder to what?” They were totally flustered.

In the New Testament we have Timothy, who some call an apostle and others call a pastor (the scripture calling him neither), being instructed to relate to the elderly man as he would his father, with honor and respect. There is something unnatural about the young rebuking the elderly. In an ecclesiastical, hierarchical context, where authority is positional rather than relational, the issue of age is irrelevant. It all depends upon who has the title and position. In today’s institutional churches it would be perceived as a compromise of a pastor’s authority to relate to any untitled individual as his senior. However, in the family esteeming others as better or superior to yourself is normal, or at least it should be. (Philippians 2:3) The church itself has become the greatest enemy of the family by its institutionalized example. This was a masterstroke of the enemy. God wants his family back!

George Davis and Michael Clark, The Great Ecclesiastical Conspiracy
Categories
Books / Videos

The Normal Christian Life

I included a couple of excerpts from Watchman Nee’s Christian classic book below. Although not specifically about house church it is highly recommended.

When the Galilean boy brought his bread to the Lord, what did the Lord do with it? He broke it. God will always break what is offered to him. He breaks what he takes, but after breaking it he blesses and uses it to meet the needs of others. After you give yourself to the Lord, he begins to break what was offered to him. Everything seems to go wrong, and you protest and find fault with the ways of God. But to stay there is to be no more than just a broken vessel-no good for the world because you have gone too far for the world to use you, and no good for God either because you have not gone far enough for him to use you. You are out of gear with the world, and you have a controversy with God. This is the tragedy of many a Christian.

My giving of myself to the Lord must be an initial fundamental act. Then, day by day, I must go on giving to him, not finding fault with his use of me, but accepting with praise even what the flesh finds hard. That way lies true enrichment.

I am the Lord’s, and now no longer reckon myself to be my own but acknowledge in everything his ownership and authority. That is the attitude God delights in, and to maintain it is true consecration. I do not consecrate myself to be a missionary or a preacher; I consecrate myself to God to do his will where I am, be it in school, office or kitchen or wherever he may, in his wisdom, send me. Whatever he ordains for me is sure to be the very best, for nothing but good can come to those who are wholly his.

May we always be possessed by the consciousness that we are not our own.

Regarding Mary anointing Jesus (Mark 14:6-8)

Of Mary the Lord said: “She hath done what she could.” What does that mean? It means that she had given up her all. She had kept nothing in reserve for a future day. She had lavished on him all she had; and yet on the resurrection morning she had no reason to regret her extravagance. And the Lord will not be satisfied with anything less from us than that we too should have done “what we could.” By this, remember, I do not mean the expenditure of our effort and energy in trying to do something for him, for that is not the point here. What the Lord Jesus looks for in us is a life laid at his feet, and that in view of his death and burial and of a future day. His burial was already in view that day in the home in Bethany. Today it is his crowning that is in view, when he shall be acclaimed in glory as the Anointed One, the Christ of God. Yes, then we shall pour out our all upon him! But it is a precious thing-indeed it is a far more precious thing to him-that we should anoint him now, not with material oil but with something costly, something from our
hearts.

That which is merely external and superficial has no place here. It has already been dealt with by the Cross, and we have given our consent to God’s judgment upon it and learned to know in experience its cutting off. What God is demanding of us now is represented by that flask of alabaster: something mined from the depths, something turned and chased and wrought upon, something that, because it is so truly of the Lord, we cherish as Mary cherished that flask, and we would not, we dare not break it. It comes now from the heart, from the very depth of our being; and we come to the Lord with that, and we break it and pour it out and say: “Lord, here it is. It is all yours, because you are worthy!”- and the Lord has got what he desired. May he receive such an anointing from us today.

Watchman Nee, The Normal Christian Life
Categories
Books / Videos

Finding Organic Church

What a great book filled with practical guidelines on how to start and sustain an Organic Church! This is in depth study of how churches were started and guided by the early apostles and why it’s necessary today to have apostles/itinerant workers laying the foundation and giving guidance for healthy church development. Below is an excerpt from the book.

Paul formed Christian communities by fathering, mothering, and nursing the Christians with whom he worked (1 Thess. 2:7-12; 1 Cor. 4:15). He showed the church how to fellowship with its Lord, how to mature in Christ, how to function in its gatherings, and how to solve specific problems endemic to community life.

Tragically, these are things that many (if not most) Christians in the institutional church know little about. To put it bluntly, being a seasoned Christian does not equip one to be a functioning member in an organic church setting. Nor does it prepare one to be a contributing member of a Christian community. In addition, finding oneself two thousand years into Christian history and five hundred years down the Reformation pike does not prepare one for such a task.

As A. W. Tozer once put it, the modern church “is an asylum for retarded spiritual children.” It’s a nursery for overgrown spiritual babes, most of whom do not have a clue about how to function spiritually with their fellow brethren in a coordinated way. And why is this? Because they have never been shown how. Instead, they have been habituated to stay silent and passive. (Except, of course, when it comes to sharing the gospel with the lost. Preachers have been pounding that into the heads of Christians since the days of D. L. Moody.) God’s people, therefore, need to be unleashed and empowered to minister in the house of God.

For this reason, the Pauline ministry of planting churches is still very much needed today. Again, far more goes into building a church than leading people to the Lord. Winning converts is merely a first step. Enriching, equipping, and empowering them to get on with God and with their fellow brethren make up the rest of the trip.


To use Peter’s language, to lead a sinner to Christ is to convert a dead stone into a living stone (1 Peter 2:5). But the accumulation of
living stones is not God’s purpose. Today, we have many living stones on the planet, but they are scattered and isolated. God’s goal is for all of those stones to be formed into a house-His very own dwelling place (Eph. 2:22). Therein lies the main calling of the Christian worker (1 Cor. 3:9-10). It’s not merely the conversion of dead stones into living stones; it’s to build the house of the living God with those stones. And that takes far more than simply preaching sermons once or twice a week. It means equipping the people of God to function in the church meetings, to take care of one another, and to witness to the glories of Christ before the world as a close-knit, Christ-centered community.

Consequently, if Paul were in the Western world today, it’s extremely likely that he would seek out the lost sheep as well as the isolated sheep. To be sure, Paul would present the gospel to lost souls. But hungry Christians in the traditional church would doubtlessly attach themselves to his work as well. Would Paul refuse to minister to them simply because they were “already” converted? Not a chance.

Paul’s goal was a kingdom community. It was a shared-life assembly that lives by divine life and is held together by Jesus Christ and nothing else. So he would undoubtedly minister to all the Christians who were open to him-new converts and institutionalized believers. He would enrich them to know Christ, equip them to express Him corporately, and empower them to function in a coordinated way.


Genuine workers in our day do just that.


Not to put too fine a point on it, Paul’s passion was to establish Christian communities marked by every member functioning, and that expressed the fullness of Jesus Christ. It was not to rescue individuals from eternal judgment (though that was included). We can be confident that if Paul were with us today, he would not be hindered from this all-consuming mission.

Frank Viola, Finding Organic Church
Categories
Books / Videos

The Pastor Has No Clothes!

I just want to honor Jon Zens for sharing truth since 1965. I’ve just recently learned about Jon and read and reviewed a couple of his books. This one is a gem and well worth your time and money. Jon totally debunks the idea that the corporate church and/or even what we call House Church needs a centralized leader/pastor. Below is an excerpt.

We are afraid of doing church without a human leader. Except, the truth is, we do have a Leader – Jesus Christ. Further, the practical reality is that every group will have leadership each time they get together. His Spirit always leads the saints to express Christ one to another in diverse ways; not in a traditional, concrete pro forma format. One sister may share something that becomes the theme that others build on – in one meeting or in several; for a day or for months, even years of interaction. Another time, a brother may tell how the Lord ministered to him in the past week, and that leads to different things, which go on from there. The point is, in organic meetings His Spirit leadership is gracious, fluid and over a period of time involves everyone. If a group looks to the same person time after time to get and to keep things rolling by solely providing the essential content of the gathering, then the living Christ blossoming through all the parts is soured.

Sadly, in this way I am convinced that we are all like Israel – we want a visible king. Read 1 Samuel 8 and see how Israel was not satisfied with having the invisible God as their Leader; they wanted to be like the nations around them who had visible human kings. It underscores human desire of having someone else tell us what vision to follow, where to meet, what to do, and what to believe – in short, to spoon-feed us like children – thus, we reject the Lord’s leadership, substituting a vastly inferior system in his place.

We all will have a king. The crucial question is, will our king be visible or Invisible? Will we run church like the corporations in the world – in other words, be like the world – or will seek higher satisfaction in following the One, whom having not seen, we love?

Do not be mistaken! These behaviors are not limited to the traditional “church” experience. I have seen this phenomenon kill the life expression in simple gatherings just as frequently. It is the existence of pastor-wannabe’s, elder-wannabe’s and former church officials who come to such a group claiming a false non-scriptural basis to “improve” their gatherings. Even among those who have completely left the institutional church, too often there is tendency to look for former “leaders” in past settings to provide the impetus for what takes place in the new one. 

Those from leadership positions in the institutional church must take their ambitions and history of being “up front” to the cross. They must take their proper place as just another brother or just a sister amongst other brothers and sisters. If not, the group will inevitably revert to an institutional form usurping Jesus’ leadership. Simply meeting in a home does not, in any way, ensure that a Christian group functions under Jesus’ Lordship. The pressing issue here is whether or not a person or group takes the place of Christ at the center of any fellowship meeting.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp