Categories
Books / Videos

How to Do Biblical “Church”…WITHOUT a Church!

I stumbled upon this great Called-Forth series by Kevin Geoffrey of The Biblically Correct Podcast. Highlighted below is episode #57 from late 2023. This is part 7 of 7. Watch it on YouTube here. Check out the podcast here and his website here. The rest of the series is linked below.

The “church” of God—Yeshua’s “Called-Forth”—was never meant to be based on form or structure, but on us: the people. In the Scriptures, we’ve been given a biblical pattern that reveals how we are supposed to work and function together as the Body of Messiah, and it looks nothing like “church” (or “Messianic synagogue”) as usual. In this episode, Kevin wraps up his 7-part series about biblical “church” with a candid word of exhortation, and a vivid sketch of what our gatherings and communities could look like… if we actually followed the Scriptures.

Episode 45, Part 1 – Why You Should Never “Go To Church”

Episode 47, Part 2 – What Is the True Church?

Episode 49, Part 3 – The Organic Structure of Biblical Church

Episode 52, Part 4 – WHERE the Biblical Church Would Meet

Episode 53, Part 5 – WHEN the Biblical Church Should Meet

Episode 55, Part 6 – The True Purpose of Church



Wow, a lot is happening, don’t miss anything, subscribe below.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Books / Videos

The Fellowship of the King

Jon Zens shared this powerful quote several months ago from Elton Trueblood’s book The Yoke of Christ and Other Sermons. I’m definitely looking forward to reading this book. I’ve already reviewed a couple of Jon Zens’ books all of which I highly recommend. You can find the reviews on my Resources page and you can find more about Jon Zens by clicking here.

“He [Jesus] did not leave an army; He did not leave an organization, in the ordinary sense. What He left, instead, was a little redemptive fellowship made up of extremely common people whose total impact was miraculous…It is hard for us to visualize what early Christianity was like. Certainly it was very different from the Christianity known to us today.

There were no fine buildings…There was no hierarchy; there were no theological seminaries; there were no Christian colleges; there were no Sunday Schools; there were no choirs. Only small groups of believers – small fellowships.

In the beginning there wasn’t even a New Testament. The New Testament itself was not so much a cause of these fellowships as a result of them. Thus the first books of the New Testament were the letters written to the little fellowships partly because of their difficulties, dangers and temptations. All that they had was the fellowship; nothing else; no standing; no prestige; no honor…

The early Christians were not a people of standing, but they had a secret power among them, and the secret power resulted from the way in which they were members one of another…What occurred in the ancient civilization was the organic development of the fellowship, but never a merely individual Christianity.

That would not have been able to survive. The fellowship was the only thing that could win. The early Christians came together to strengthen one another and to encourage one another in their humble gatherings such as are described in 1 Cor. 14, and then they went out into their ministry in the Greco-Roman world…

All of these parts [of the empire] were touched because the fellowship itself had such intensity, such vitality, and such power…If all the salt is washed out of [the fellowship], if all that is left is just the worldly emphasis of respectability and fine buildings, an ecclesiastical structure and conventional religion with the redemptive power gone, it isn’t partly good; it isn’t any good.

Christ is saying that mild religion, far from being of partial value, is of utterly no value…It is easy to go on with the motions; it is easy to continue a structure; it is easy to go on with a system. But Christ says it isn’t worth a thing.”

Elton Trublood, The Yoke of Christ and Other Sermons

Keep up with what’s going on, please subscribe.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Books / Videos

Going to Church in the First Century

This short fifty page narrative by author Robert Banks is quite engaging. This story is told by a fictional character called Publius Valerius Amicius Rufus who is invited to a Christian gathering for the first time. An excerpt from the book is below.

When everyone had seated themselves and Lysias had packed away the game, Aquila bowed his head slightly and asked the spirit of his god to guide all that now took place. As before he did this quite simply and matter-of-factly. After a short pause he then suggested we sing a song, the one the children particularly liked. This met with general approval. Gaius, who had a fine baritone
voice, led off and soon everyone was joining in, the children clapping their hands as they sang. I even managed to join in myself after a while. I enjoy nothing more than a good sing but don’t very often get the chance to indulge. We nearly lifted the rafters off in the last chorus, so goodness knows what the people next door made of it!

The song had no sooner finished than Clement closed his eyes and began to talk to his god. Like Aquila, he spoke in a quite ordinary fashion, almost as if his god were a close acquaintance in the same room. As Clement conversed with him, he repeated something that had been mentioned several times in the song, about the world as a present from the god to us. A strange idea, don’t you think? He expanded on this at some length. He went into a lot of detail about so often taken-for-granted things that we use, see, hear and smell every day which come from god’s hands. While he was talking, there were occasional murmurs of agreement from others in the room. At the end there was a loud affirmation from the whole group.

This same pattern repeated itself as different people spoke, women as well as men, and even one of the children. Some of the conversations with the god were as long as Clement’s, some no more than a few words. Most followed up in some way or other the subject which Clement had culled out of the first song. At one stage, for example, the Jewish weaver thanked the god for his generosity to his ancestors, listing a number of things which marked them out from other races, though also apologising for their constant failure to reciprocate. A very hesitant sentence or two also came from Tyro, in which he thanked the god that he now understood how much he had done for him, in particular the gift of his one and only son. At the end of this, the heads of each family present, and one or two of the others, went across the room and laid hands on him, welcoming him into their community and pledging him their future support. He was actually moved to tears by this and could scarcely express his gratitude to them. Despite the strangeness of the occasion, I must admit to being a little moved myself. As they resumed their places Hermas said there was a psalm out of the sacred writings which he felt was particularly appropriate to the occasion. He must have had a good memory for this kind of thing, for the recitation lasted
some minutes.

‘Would you like a copy of it?’ he asked Tyro when he had ended. ‘I could easily write one out for you.’

The other nodded, still a little overwhelmed, I think, by what had happened earlier and all the attention he was receiving.

Robert Banks, Going to Church in the First Century
Categories
Books / Videos

Are You Living a Wish Dream?

Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s Life Together is a classic on fostering authentic Christian community. As expected, from any book written in 1938, the language and content may seem a bit outdated but the concepts are full of wisdom and still worthy of discussion. The following is an excerpt that is relevant for today.

Innumerable times a whole Christian community has broken down because it had sprung from a wish dream. The serious Christian, set down for the first time in a Christian community, is likely to bring with him a very definite idea of what Christian life together should be and to try to realize it. But God’s grace speedily shatters such dreams. Just as surely as God desires to lead us to a knowledge of genuine Christian fellowship, so surely must we be over-whelmed by a great disillusionment with others, with Christians in general, and, if we are fortunate, with ourselves.

By sheer grace, God will not permit us to live even for a brief period in a dream world. He does not abandon us to those rapturous experiences and lofty moods that come over us like a dream. God is not a God of the emotions but the God of truth. Only that fellowship which faces such disillusionment, with all its unhappy and ugly aspects, begins to be what it should be in God’s sight, begins to grasp in faith the promise that is given to it. The sooner this shock of disillusionment comes to an individual and to a community the better for both. A community which cannot bear and cannot survive such a crisis, which insists upon keeping its illusion when it should be shattered, permanently loses in that moment the promise of Christian community. Sooner or later it will collapse. Every human wish dream that is injected into the Christian community is a hindrance to genuine community and must be banished if genuine community is to survive. He who loves his dream of a community more than the Christian community itself becomes a destroyer of the latter, even though his personal intentions may be ever so honest and earnest and sacrificial.

God hates visionary dreaming; it makes the dreamer proud and pretentious. The man who fashions a visionary ideal of community demands that it be realized by God, by others, and by himself. He enters the community of Christians with his demands, sets up his own law, and judges the brethren and God Himself accordingly. He stands adamant, a living reproach to all others in the circle of brethren. He acts as if he is the creator of the Christian community, as if his dream binds men together. When things do not go his way, he calls the effort a failure. When his ideal picture is destroyed, he sees the community going to smash. So he becomes, first an accuser of his brethren, then an accuser of God, and finally the despairing accuser of himself.

Because God has already laid the only foundation of our fellowship, because God has bound us together in one body with other Christians in Jesus Christ, long before we entered into common life with them, we enter into that common life not as demanders but as thankful recipients. We thank God for what He has done for us. We thank God for giving us brethren who live by His call, by His forgiveness, and His promise. We do not complain of what God does not give us; we rather thank God for what He does give us daily. And is not what has been given us enough: brothers, who will go on living with us through sin and need under the blessing of His grace? Is the divine gift of Christian fellowship anything less than this, any day, even the most difficult and distressing day? Even when sin and misunderstanding burden the communal life, is not the sinning brother still a brother, with whom I, too, stand under the Word of Christ? Will not his sin be a constant occasion for me to give thanks that both of us may live in the forgiving love of God in Jesus Christ? Thus the very hour of disillusionment with my brother becomes incomparably salutary, because it so thoroughly teaches me that neither of us can ever live by our own words and deeds, but only by that one Word and Deed which really binds us together-the forgiveness of sins in Jesus Christ. When the morning mists of dreams vanish, then draws the bright day of Christian fellowship.

Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Life Together

Thank you for subscribing.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Arizona Organic Church

Arizona House Church

Categories
Books / Videos

Don’t Tell Me, Show Me

This is the second excerpt from Christian Smith’s excellent book Going to the Root.

The Bible helps us see where we went wrong.  For the Bible makes it clear that the central and irreplaceable medium for communicating the gospel is the quality of believers’ lives together.

Jesus’ last message to his followers was: “Love one another; just as I have loved you, you also must love one another.  Everyone will know that you are my disciples if you love one another” (John 13:34-35, author’s paraphrase). Actions, apparently, speak louder than words. The lives of people who genuinely love each other, for all their warts and false starts, will be a truer explanation of the good news than the most precisely pitched evangelistic message.

Peter urges Christians to, “as aliens and strangers in the world, abstain from sinful desires…. Live such good lives among the pagans that, though they accuse you of doing wrong, they may see your good deeds and glorify God” (1 Pet. 2:11-12, author’s paraphrase). Likewise, Paul urges the Corinthians to conduct themselves so that when an unbeliever sees them, “he will fall down and worship God, exclaiming, ‘God is really among you!'” (1 Cor. 14:25, NIV).

I recently heard of a Christian smoker who tried hard to keep his smoking hidden so that it wouldn’t “ruin his testimony.”  Not only does this kind of attitude lose sight of priorities (smoking is ruining his lungs more than his testimony), it presumes nonbelievers can be tricked into the kingdom by lives without substance. In fact, the world is not fooled or impressed by facades of righteousness. Would we, in our evangelistic programs, like to see new believers every day? Let’s look at how it happened in the
early church.

These remained faithful to the teaching of the apostles, to the brotherhood, to the breaking of the bread and to prayers. The many miracles and signs worked through the apostles made a deep impression on everyone. The faithful all lived together and owned everything in common; they sold their goods and possessions and shared out the proceeds among themselves according to what each one needed. They went as a body to the Temple every day but met in their houses for the breaking of bread; they shared their food gladly and generously; they praised God and were looked up to by everyone. Day by day the Lord added to their community those destined to be saved. (Acts 2:42-47, JB; also see 4:32-35)

No Christian bumper stickers here. They simply lived authentically redeemed lives in community. The depth of that life did its own communicating.

Luke goes to great lengths to tell how Peter and John got to preach to the people at the temple and to the Sanhedrin (Acts 3:1-4:31). They didn’t entice the people into their church buildings with comfortable pews and films. They didn’t even intend to preach at all, but simply to pray. However, “it happened that (3:2, JB). Peter and John were simply living as channels of God’s healing love. It was only after this act of healing and love that they preached as an explanation of what had happened. Evangelism flowed naturally from living out the transforming power of the kingdom of God. No slick techniques were necessary.

Biblical evangelism, then, is not cornering people and confronting them with the gospel. Nor is it charming people with a sweet, easy pseudo-gospel. Biblical evangelism is first incarnating the reign of God in community, then answering the inevitable questions: “Why do you live the way you do? What motivates you to live so differently?” Peter wrote, “In your hearts set apart Christ as Lord, and always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give a reason for the hope that you have” (1 Pet. 3:15, author’s paraphrase).

When I first worked on developing my writing skills, a composition teacher offered me a simple maxim: “Don’t tell me, show me.” That maxim is also the best advice for churches interested in responsible and effective evangelism.  The world is sick and tired of being told about Jesus. The world needs to be shown Jesus.

As Christ was God incarnate, God in flesh and blood living in obedience to his parent, so we the church are to be Christ incarnate. We are to be Christ’s body, living out in flesh and blood the reign of God. This is a difficult project for marketing agents, but it’s the basic calling of God’s people.

Sometimes our kingdom lifestyles can bear witness without our intending it. For the past eight years, my wife and I have lived in cooperatively owned, multifamily houses with others in our community. A few years ago we and another family wanted to move together to a new neighborhood.

Our realtor was amazed. “I have never seen cooperative housing last for more than one house!” she exclaimed. “What’s your secret?”

Right then, in a way that would have never happened had I simply handed her an evangelistic tract, I had the opportunity to explain something about the kingdom. “The reason why we live this way is because….”

It is time to abandon our high-tech evangelistic outreaches, pull the plugs on the television programs, and peel off our Christian bumper stickers. Having fired our Madison Avenue consultants and dumped our direct-mail schemes, we can get back to basics. We can communicate the gospel by the witness of our lives. That means focusing our energies on becoming more fully the people of God. It means living lives which are so obviously influenced by an encounter with God that no one can find another reasonable explanation for us.

Christian Smith, Going to the Root

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Books / Videos

Freedom is Overrated

Going To The Root was published in 1992 by Christian Smith and is full of wisdom and great insight. This will be my first of two excerpts from the book.

Discipleship stands at the heart of Christian community. We do not build community primarily for emotional intimacy and social support – although we do experience those things in community.  Rather, we build community primarily to follow Christ and to more faithfully and effectively allow God to reign in our lives.  That is what makes these communities Christian ones and not just social clubs.

Christianity is a corporate as well as an individual faith. Becoming like Christ is a relational as well as personal process. For this reason, God calls believers to make their faith-journeys together, in small bands of people called “church.” For our own well-being and growth, we need the benefit of each others’ spiritual gifts, encouragements, role modeling, and challenges.

It is largely by sharing our lives in relationship together over time that God strengthens our faith, builds our character, and shapes us into the people we are meant to be. This makes sense, since most Christian virtues and fruits of the Spirit to which we are called-love, service, gentleness, humility, self-giving, patience, kindness, forgiveness-are expressed in relationships, not in isolation.

A key aspect of discipleship in Christian community is personal accountability. In community, we learn to be accountable. We learn, literally, to give an account to others. Accountability means that we can ask each other what is going on in our lives, how we are doing, or what is the state of our souls. And we can expect an honest answer.

Accountability also means that we can confront each other and be reconciled when we disappoint, anger, or hurt each other. Finally, accountability means that when we live irresponsibly or sinfully, we can admonish each other without fear of ruining our relationships.

Accountability in community rejects Lone Ranger Christianity. It repudiates privatized, individualistic faith. Accountability instead acknowledges our human and spiritual interdependence. It admits that our actions and attitudes affect each other deeply. We thus have a basic responsibility to each other.

Accountability recognizes that believers need each other’s help and support in pursuing the kingdom of God. It knows we all have blind spots that others we know and trust can help us with. Being accountable means not saying “Mind your own business” but being instead willing to work through issues and problems until we reach unity and love.

Being held accountable is often difficult. Holding another accountable can be even harder. Accountability is unnatural for those of us raised in an individualistic, freedom-oriented, North American culture. Accountability is not an attempt to bully or police each other, however. It simply aims to build responsible, loving relationships in the context of Christian discipleship. Although accountability may not be quickly mastered, it can be learned through practice aided by God’s grace and the community’s support. And when accountability is exercised correctly, it is not a chore, but a deeply rewarding means to strengthen relationships and foster human growth.

In community, believers gradually relearn how to relate to each other according to the principles of the kingdom of God. They learn, for example, how to really love and serve each other in concrete ways, how to support each other in difficult times. They learn how to admonish and forgive each other for hurts or sins. They learn how to share their resources, and how together to minister God’s mercy and love to broken people in a broken world.

Gradually, as believers learn these things, their communities develop distinct ways of life. They acquire particular patterns of social relations visibly different from those practiced by people in the larger world. The community then becomes a new social reality in which the kingdom of God is expressed, not only in the actions and attitudes of its individuals, but in the culture and social relations of a whole body of people.

By simply living out concrete, alternative social realities, informed by an alternative set of spiritual values, Christian communities witness to the breaking of the kingdom of God into history.  By simply being the people of God in this way, communities stand as concrete signs that God is indeed transforming this world by his love and mercy.

Hence, living in Christian community is both a necessary means for pursuing Christian discipleship and the natural result of a body of people shaping their lives according to God’s kingdom.  Christian community is, in this sense, both the path and the destination for believers.

Christian Smith, Going to the Root

Please subscribe below. Thank you.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Books / Videos

Jesus, Disciple, Mission, Church

This short work by Chris J. Jefferies is a summary of Alan Hirsch’s book The Forgotten Ways. This 50 page summary is ideal for use as a small group study guide. Questions along the way help readers navigate from theory to practical application. I have included an excerpt below entitled “Structure For Life”. You can download a free copy by clicking here.

Change or remove anything and everything that stifles real life; good structures are very simple and easy to copy. Think about gardening rather than engineering because gardening involves living things. What is the easiest way to make a city? What is the easiest way to make a forest?

Remember that living things grow by themselves according to the life code (DNA) that is within them. An oak tree cannot produce grains of wheat and an acorn can never grow into a cabbage. In the same way, it’s impossible for the church to produce seeds of injustice and someone who continues to follow Jesus can never grow into a thief. Each grows according to its type. Jesus said we’d be known by the fruit we produce, either good or bad. Aim to produce plentiful, good fruit! (Matthew 7:15-20).

In other words, you don’t need to make the church grow. You can’t! All you can do is help the process start and provide the right conditions. Take good seed, bury it to the right depth in well tilled and manured ground, make sure it has enough water, keep away weeds and pests and your job is done. There will be a good harvest, but it might take a little time and patience.

Make sure leaders give power away, not hold onto it as the world tends to do; leaders should see themselves as servants (Matthew 20:25-28). Encourage every part of your group to think for itself, and give everyone the opportunity to use their gifts and interests freely and fully. What did Paul write about the body of Christ? (Ephesians 4:11-13) Encourage passion and ownership by telling great stories; invite people to act with boldness and ‘have a go’; involve everyone in planning. Celebrate every success; rethink and retry after every failure. Learn from every mistake and look for the positive aspects; never give up.

Share information as widely and openly as possible. Get apostles, prophets, evangelists, shepherds and teachers to explain what they do to everyone. Share any problems and talk about them; if possible become part of a wider network; welcome change whenever it’s needed. Don’t try to turn chaos into order but instead see if you can find meaning in the chaos. You may need to change your point of view or encourage others to say what they think.

It’s best to structure things around the passion, energy and life that you see in people. Everyone is a potential power house in their own, unique way so encourage them to be more active, not less. Don’t build ‘windbreaks’ that slow the wind down, instead build ‘windmills’ that harness its energy. Remove obstructions to active life and, when that is not possible, find alternative pathways to get around them. Build mission and church around people’s interests, and choose meeting times to avoid clashing with social gatherings in the wider community. Let go when something is no longer useful, support new ideas and fresh energy whenever they appear in the group.

Shared beliefs and purposes are great at holding networks together. So form common values, beliefs and practices and help newcomers to understand them. Find simple, clear, memorable ways to talk about them. Share the stories of the group’s origins often and in as many ways as possible. Encourage one another and tell people why you value them.

Discuss – Spend some time right now to dig out the stories of how your group got started. Write these stories down; perhaps someone will volunteer to collect them in a notebook or folder or post them to a blog. Also, talk about the ideas in this section. How many of them are you already doing? List examples. Where do you need to do better?

Chris J. Jefferies, Jesus, Disciple, Mission, Church

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Books / Videos

Community 101

For those looking for some real meat to sink their teeth into, here it is. This book by Gilbert Bilezikian took me awhile to finish but it was well worth the effort. Taking the time to chew and digest Gilbert’s comments about authentic community, real leadership and the role of women in ministry was eye-opening. Below is an excerpt about servant leadership. Get your steak knives out!

Because Jesus knew that the kingdom he was bringing was not of this world, he also knew that it would not be structured like the kingdoms of this world. Early in his ministry, he made it clear that his kingdom would be for the poor in spirit, the meek, and the merciful. But his disciples lived in a world where these sorts of people were ruthlessly crushed at the bottom of the pyramid of hierarchies that made up their social environments.

The pecking order was an inescapable reality of daily life, whether in the home, at the marketplace, in the synagogue, or in political life; everyone had to assume one’s appropriate rank on multiple ladders of hierarchy in consideration of birth, race,  gender, fortune, and influence. This mentality was so pervasive that the disciples could not think of the kingdom of God in different terms. They knew that Jesus was dedicated to the task of launching a new community. They also realized that they would be the charter members of this organization. Because they were the first participants, they also thought that they should be foremost in it. But there were twelve of them, and all twelve of them could not be in first place. So, they argued among themselves as to “who was the greatest” (Mark 9:33-34). They were in competition against each other for the position of front-runner in the kingdom of Jesus Christ!

When Jesus learned of the disciples’ contest, he sat down. Their discussion was a hard blow to him, and he took it sitting down. Gathering the Twelve for an emergency teaching session, he summarized his message in the following words: “If anyone wants to be first, he must be the very last, and the servant of all” (9:35).

Jesus did not condemn as wrong the desire to be first. Leaders  are needed, and the desire to use one’s gift of leadership is legitimate. But Jesus transformed the concept of leadership by redefining its style and the motivation for doing it. The style demands that roles of leadership be fulfilled not with the pride of one who comes first, not with the self-glory of one who wins a competition, but with the humility of one who comes in last. The motivation should not be the desire to rule, control, or command, but to support and assist others, just as a servant does.

In other words, leadership among Christians is not  authority-intensive but service-based. Biblical leadership is willingness to fall behind in order to help those who are struggling instead of striving to be first and to win the competition for power. There is no command or instruction in the New Testament for any Christian to exercise authority over another. But there are strict orders for all Christians, including leaders, to act as servants within their communities (Matt. 20:26; Mar 9:35; Gal. 5:13; etc.).

In order to drive the point home, Jesus gave the disciples a living illustration of what it means to be servant to others. He brought “a little child” and had him stand in their midst, and then he took the child in his arms (Mark 9:36). The disciples had no use for children. They treated them as a nuisance and wanted them out of their way (10:13-16). But Jesus showed them the deep meaning of servanthood by making a child, who had no significance for the disciples, the most important person in the world for him at that moment. Jesus explained to them that by loving and serving lesser ones, as he was doing for the child, they would really be serving Christ and loving God, who had sent him to serve in this manner (9:37).

Jesus went on to reveal the servant-mindedness that motivates the Godhead by stating that he was willing to identify with the lowly child as closely as he was himself identified with the Father. By receiving children one received him, just as one who received him also received the Father. This was a complete reversal of the competitive, ascendancy-driven values of the world. It meant going all the way down the world’s ladders of hierarchy and  lifting up those at the bottom above oneself. Concern for children, for the weak, and for the disadvantaged was not invented by welfare organizations. It was ordained by Jesus as an authentic expression of servant leadership (Matt. 25:34-40).

The disciples seemed to be bent on going out of their way to demonstrate how uncomprehending they were of Jesus’ teaching and of the ways of the kingdom of God. Not long after this teaching, Jesus caught them chasing away parents who wanted him to bless their children (Mark 10:13-16). Jesus became “indignant” and told the bumptious disciples, driven by upward mobility aspirations, that unless they became as submissive and unpretentious as the little children they were despising, they would have no part in the kingdom of God. In order to enter that kingdom, they had to receive it as a child does (v. 15). A child receiving the kingdom does not aspire to positions of authority and power. The kingdom is not for those who use it to position themselves above others but for those who enter it as servants.

Gilbert Bilezikian, Community 101

Please subscribe to get blog updates. Blessings!

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Books / Videos

the Naked Church – Clergy/Laity

This is another great book by Wayne Jacobsen. Previously involved in the institutional church, Wayne writes honestly and powerfully about his transition and why true Biblical relationships are the most healthy for Christ followers. The following is the second of two excerpts from his book. This excerpt talks about the clergy/laity divide. This book is available for purchase or can be downloaded free by clicking here.

The power of a clergy class over the so­ called laity has always been a focal point of church reformers. Church leadership easily falls into the trap of validating their usefulness by placing them­selves as an essential link to personal spirituality. Reformers have instead championed the priesthood of all believers—which sim­ply means that every believer can have a personal relationship with God and be used by him to touch others. Leaders may have distinct functions in the body, but they do not have a relationship with God substantially different from that of other believers. 

Never before in the history of the church has the theology of priesthood received so much lip service and so little actual practice as in this century. Though it is preached with conviction from our pulpits, only a small percentage of believers are involved in significant ministry opportunities on a daily basis. They may be doing busywork for someone else’s program, but they are neither thriving in their spiritual experience nor confident to intervene in crisis situations. 

I would say that fully 90 percent of those who were already Christians when they came to a fellowship I pastored did not at that time have a daily time of worship and bible reading which was effectively nurturing their lives. They had been accustomed to being fed by pastors and TV preachers. When opportunity arose to lead someone to Christ or to liberate them from oppres­sive bondage, they were told to see the pastor or come to church for their answers. We are breeding a generation of believers who perceive themselves as incompetent to live out the Word in their own experience. 

How are we doing this? Church leaders have historically used two tactics to keep people dependent. Regrettably we have our twentieth­ century versions of these today, subtle or unintentional though they be. 

The first revolves around interpretation of the Word. Are the Scriptures clear enough for the average person to read and understand, or must they be interpreted by a professional? In the days of John Wycliffe this issue was obvious. The Bible was available only in Latin, which the priests alone could read and interpret. The church killed anyone who translated it into com­mon languages or who possessed translated copies. This they did in spite of the fact that the Holy Spirit used mostly unlearned men to pen his Word. The New Testament itself was written in the style of Greek used on the street, not the classical style used by scholars. 

Today misapplied scholasticism serves the same purpose of making people feel as though they can’t understand the Word on their own. I’m not against the knowledge which the church has gained over the centuries nor using the original languages to help us understand the Word more fully. If, however, we use those tools week after week to say that though the text seems to say one thing it really says something else, we effectively destroy people’s confidence in feeding from the Word themselves. Good preaching doesn’t dazzle people with interpretations of the Word that defy the imagination; but instead equips people with a fuller appreciation for the inherent simplicity of the Word and increases their ability to understand it. At the end of a good sermon people should respond, “yes, I see that!” 

The second tactic to keep the masses dependent on leader­ship is to make them a mediator in the salvation process. In the Middle Ages the church viewed the communion elements as the means of salvation—which only a priest could consecrate. The priest could withhold communion from whomever he chose; convincing them that they had been denied salvation. 

We have long recognized that the whim of a man cannot determine salvation. Many people, however, surrender the qual­ity of their spiritual life to ministry professionals and become willingly dependent upon them. We’ll take a closer look at this phenomenon in Chapter 11, but for now I want only to point out the adverse effect which ministry professionals often have on spiritual intimacy. 

Instead of people sitting at the feet of Jesus themselves, hearing his voice and obeying his will, they sit at the feet of their favorite teacher. Public ­relations techniques have produced a generation of leaders today who aspire to lead by their own personal popu­larity. We have our celebrities just like the world does, and many Christians are more awed by them than by the Lord himself. 

Media use today has only heightened this problem. Instead of multiplying ministry through transformed people, we seek to do it through satellite dishes and direct mail. How ineffective these have proven to demonstrate God’s love or to help people grow up in Christ! Some people can’t make it through the day without a fix from their pastor’s cassette ministry or a word from the TV evangelist they champion. In an age of capitalistic Christianity, leaders only encourage such dependence: “You must hear what I’m going to talk about next week.” “This series on growth will change your life like nothing else you’ve ever heard.” Dependent people ensure the future of the ministry. 

Even church­ growth experts suggest that this kind of promo­tion and visibility is essential for church growth. We’ve entered dangerous waters indeed when the promotion of a man’s image is the means by which we extend the gospel. The reformation did us little good if we only exchanged one pope for thousands of little popes through whom to live out our Christian experience. 

No wonder people perceive themselves as incompetent to handle the situations in their life through personal knowledge of the Word, sensitivity to the spirit, and support of the body! While our books on child­rearing were intended to help parents, they often do the opposite. I constantly remind discouraged parents that they do not need a degree in child psychology to raise their children. Any parent who takes a personal interest in his or her child is in a far better place to disciple and discipline that child than any outsider, no matter what the outsider’s knowledge or experience. Though we can benefit from the insights of other people, we must be sure that they do not intimidate us. 

In the same way, daily Christian living has become far too complex. Jesus chose the weak things to confound the wise. With all the principles and precepts that have been outlined in recent years, we need to ask ourselves whether we’ve kept things simple enough for the person on the street to walk with God in confidence. Jesus channeled a powerful gospel through the lives of fishermen, farmers, and former harlots. Walking with Jesus is within the reach of every individual, for he makes us competent to walk out the gospel in our own lives (2 Corinthians 3:4,5).

Wayne Jacobsen, the Naked Church

Please subscribe and thank you.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Books / Videos

the Naked Church – Who’s Your Daddy?

This is another great book by Wayne Jacobsen. Previously involved in the institutional church, Wayne writes honestly and powerfully about his transition and why true Biblical relationships are the most healthy for Christ followers. The following is the first of two excerpts from his book. This excerpt asks who is your covering. This book is available for purchase or can be downloaded free by clicking here.

It is usually not long in the Christian journey before the question of accountability surfaces. Some churches talk about the impor­tance of having a covering, by which they mean a committed rela­tionship to a local church institution. Without one your salvation is suspect. This thinking is built on the notion that an individual cannot be trusted to discern truth and so must draw that security from a tradition, denomination or trained professional. 

It is so much a part of our religious psyche that it remains unchallenged, even though not one New Testament Scripture vests our accountability in another human being. In actuality the New Covenant declares quite the opposite. Each of us are account­able to God alone for our choices. At no time did the early apostles project authority over others, nor command their actions. Instead, they urged, beseeched and encouraged leaving each person to live consistent with their individual conscience. 


When some among the Ephesian elders had begun to pervert the gospel in order to ply their own power games over people, John wrote for them to trust the anointing they each had from the Holy Spirit. “You have no need for anyone to teach you,” John wrote, drawing a clear distinction between the value of receiving good teaching when offered, but never trusting someone else’s interpretation over the discernment of our hearts. 


From an institutional perspective, direct accountability to God has never been popular in church history, and cries of anarchy are raised at its mention. Instead we’ve entrusted our security to church councils, creeds or religious hierarchy, even though all these mechanisms have at various times led down paths far from the mission and character of Christ.


Jim Peterson shows, in his compelling book, Church Without Walls, that the major reason religious structures amass power is their desire to be the arbiter of truth. Yet, “Jesus never said or did anything to indicate that structure and organization could serve to protect God’s people… [He was not] against structure. It is neces­sary, as we shall see, but for protecting his people, he had some­thing far more trustworthy—the Holy Spirit.”


It would not be an overstatement to say that all heresies and abuse have come from those who would be leaders over the church of Jesus Christ. And it is usually not long in the formation of a religious tradition for people to use it to satisfy their own preferences, rather than help them stay true to the gospel. Even the early church evidenced this problem. 


From a personal perspective, direct accountability to God has never been popular either. It seems that we would prefer to subscribe to the dictates of a religious tradition, rather than to risk walking with the living God. We give up our own study of scriptures to get fed by our pastor or favorite teachers. Parents abdicate their role of discipleship to the church program. And instead of helping the needy we refer them to church counseling programs when all they need is someone to love them and take a personal interest in their lives. This is the road more traveled, because our flesh prefers the path of least resistance and risk, to firsthand accountability to God. 


But intimacy doesn’t work without unmediated access to God. All lines of accountability in the New Testament are clearly drawn between God and the individual. We will each stand or fall before him based on our response to his work through our conscience, and will not be able to point fingers at political or ecclesiastical authorities for our deception or lack of obedience. The awareness of that responsibility will lead us to listen carefully to other believ­ers, and to weigh the counsel of those who may be further down the road than ourselves. In the end, however, each of us must have the the freedom to respond to God as best we see fit. No church tradition or leader can usurp that place. 


Far from freeing us to do whatever we want to do in God’s name, this realization confronts us with the reality of our own struggle to know the difference between flesh and spirit. We’d much rather not sort this out on our own, but follow someone else’s prescription for relationship. But none will suffice. Our flesh gravitates to the path of least risk and resistance, and will even abuse any prescription in an effort to hide behind it. 


In order to grow in intimacy, we have to face the power of our own self­-preferring nature, that exalts itself above God’s purpose in its quest for comfort and satisfaction. Here the battle for inti­macy is won or lost.

Wayne Jacobsen, the Naked Church

Please sign up to receive my blog updates. I only send out about 2 a month so you won’t be overwhelmed. Thank you.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp