Categories
Thoughts from Others

The King’s Version

Written by Buff Scott, Jr.

Being Clear From The Beginning

I think it might be expedient to say that if King James had not intervened in the efforts of his Hebrew and Greek scholars, the KJV of the Scriptures might have turned out to be among the most accurate translations. His interference and dictatorial decrees must have annoyed his scholars and surely impeded their endeavor to translate the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts flawlessly – or at least as closely as possible to the oldest available manuscripts.    

Consequently, most of the blame for the distorted sections of the KJV should be ascribed to King James, not to his translators. The King’s preferences relating to “church,” “Easter,”  “baptize,” “Bishop,” plus other Biblical terms, had to be adhered to by his translators. Indeed he became the foremost innovator of “Mad Church Disease,” “Mad Easter Disease,” “Mad Bishop Disease,” and other theological disfigurements. The “side-effects” from the King’s blunders can be seen in the myriads of divisions, discords, and schisms among us.

He told his translators, “When any word hath divers significations, that to be kept which has been most commonly used by the most eminent fathers, being agreeable to the propriety of the place, and the analogy of the faith.”

    To paraphrase the King, “When any word has different meanings, you are to keep only the most commonly used by the most eminent church fathers who founded our faith, regardless of the Greek’s implication.”www.bible-researcher.com/kjvhist.html

The King’s Decrees To His Translators

Please give your attention to the History. King James instructed his translators, “The old ecclesiastical words to be kept…” He insisted that all ecclesiastical terms be retained. In Hebrews 2:12 of the KJV, the writer quotes from Psalms 22:22, “For which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren, saying, ‘I will declare thy name unto my brethren; in the midst of the church will I sing praise unto you.’

The Psalmist passage in the KJV reads, “I will declare thy name unto my brethren; in the midst of the congregation will I praise thee.” The Hebrew word for “congregation” is kaw-hawl, which means assembly, company, congregation, community. The Greek counterpart for congregation or assembly is ekklesia. The King’s method of manipulating is almost unbelievable, for in Psalms 22:22 “congregation” is accurate, but in Hebrews 2:12 “church” is inaccurate, faulty translated, spurious, and a total distortion of the Greek.

Travel With Me To Acts, Chapter 19

It can easily be demonstrated that King James was inconsistent and manipulative. In verses 32, 39, and 41, ekklesia correctly delivers “assembly.” My concern is why did his translators fail to translate ekklesia “church” in these passages, as they did elsewhere? If they and the King had been logically compatible, we would have, “For the church was confused,” “It shall be determined in a lawful church,” and “He dismissed the church.”    

The reason for this discrepancy is evident. The  king  forced “church” into his translation to bolster his sect, The Established Church of England. The point I wish to make is if ekklesia is delivered correctly here, it is delivered incorrectly wherever “church” is found. There is no escaping this fact. The King went wild in using “church.” In verse 37, he even used it in place of “temple!”     

One of the foundational features of The Established Church of England sect was that she was colonized around “church,” just as our religious parties are. Hence, to keep “church” out of his version of the scriptures would have made him appear as though he were King and Head of a commonplace congregation or assembly. That would have been degrading!

Screenshot

“Church” And Other Translations

“Church” became so common following the KJV that most all other translations followed suit. There are a few exceptions, however. The Authentic New Testament [1955], translated by Hugh J. Schonfield, a Jew, gives “congregation” as the translation of ekklesia. Alexander Campbell’s Living Oracles [1800s] does not carry “church.” He used “church” in some of his writings, but he left it out of his Living Oracles. He knew the Greek ekklesia did not justify it. Another translation destitute of  “church” is The Christian Bible [1991].      

The deliberate mistake made by King James has cost us dearly, for contemporary religions have pounced upon his offense by creating and establishing sects and factions under the guise of “church” until they have divided and sub-divided themselves out of practical existence. The result? An apostate system.    

Another one of the King’s unsightly terms is “Bishop,” as used in 1 Timothy 3:1 and Titus 1:7. The Established Church of England had autocratic leaders called “Bishops.” The Greek in the Timothy passage is ep-is-kop-ay’ and means “inspection” or “superintendence” – in short, an overseer or superintendent.    

The Greek in Titus is ep-is’-kop-os, signifying leadership abilities, overseer, or one in charge. Age-wise, these men were elders and gifted with wisdom, hospitably, and self-controlled. Young inexperienced men were never referred to as “elders,” for they are usually hot-headed and lack control and wisdom. “Bishop” portrays authority, control, and supremacy, the exact personality of The Established Church of England. Our Lord did not found this sort of ekklesia.

One More Botch

Let’s briefly address one more of the King’s botches before we close – namely, “Easter,” as found in Acts 12:7. The Greek is pascha, meaning Passover. I have before me Adam Clarke’s treatise on The Acts of the Apostles. Clarke was a renowned Hebrew and Greek theologian (1762-1832). Here are his comments on King James’ deliberate indiscretion. They are mentally stimulating!   

“The goddess Easter,  whose festival was celebrated by our pagan forefathers on the month of April…Perhaps there never was a more unhappy, not to say absurd, translation than that in our text…Every view we can take of this subject shows the gross impropriety of retaining a name every way exceptionable and palpably absurd” (pages 774-775).

And there we have it. Other translations correct many of King James’ missteps and mistakes, but not all errors have been rectified – particularly “church.” I suspect we are stuck with it until time is no more. But I will never again use it as a unifying appellation, glorify it, or praise it. I am forever finished with “Mad Church Disease,”  except to reveal its partisan, divisive colors.

This article is from my friend Buff Scott, Jr. You can find out more about Buff, sign up for his newsletter or download his three books by clicking here.

To receive my bi-monthly newsletters sign up below.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Thoughts from Others

An Audience with the King

By Victoria Holt

I woke up multiple times last night, and always with the same thought ricocheting through my spirit in acute awareness: “You’re not a ‘group’…”

Finally, in the wee hours of the morning, I simply stayed up. I chose to be still, and listen.

Prior to last night, I’d been praying about this for some time because whenever I would hear someone use that word in reference to any local assembly of worshippers of our Lord, it really bothered me. So yes; I was very ready to have an audience with Him about this matter. And what a time we had together! What sweet reminders He gave of the truth.

The truth?

We’re not merely some “group.”

We are a local ἐκκλησίᾳ that meets in a house. We are worshippers of the Lord Jesus Christ who has reconciled us to the Father and sealed us with the Holy Spirit, and in fact, we’re one of many ἐκκλησίαι that meet in a house as described in 1 Corinthians 16:19, Romans 16:1-5, Acts 2:1-47, Acts 5:12-42, Acts 12:1-17, Acts 16:1-40, and Acts 20:18-21; and Matthew 18:20 is as true here, as it is elsewhere. Where most translations translate ἐκκλησίᾳ as “church” and ἐκκλησίαι as “churches”, some translations use the words “all who gather”, or “congregation/churches”, or “assembly/assemblies”, or some believers use the anglicized “ekklesia”.

Bottom line?

We’re His people through His loving sacrifice, knit together tenderly by Him for His express purposes, on His terms. And we’re so blessed to be that!

Each local fellowship of those who are born again in Christ Jesus is blessed to be very much a part of the entire holy household of the Living God… the family of God; and that’s regardless of whether we meet in a house or elsewhere, or what native language we speak, or whether we sing hymns or more modern music, etc., etc., etc. 1 Corinthians 1:1-31 (!!), 1 Timothy 3:14-15, Ephesians 4:4-6 and a host of other such passages of the Scriptures make that crystal clear. We each are one part of His household built of “living stones” (1 Peter 2:4-5), and in addition, in the boundless mercy and grace of our Lord, we are also part of “a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God’s own possession, so that you may proclaim the excellencies of Him who has called you out of darkness into His marvelous light” (1 Peter 2:9).

We are part of the household of God, and of the household of faith (Galatians 6:10).

Wowsa!

That does not get old to me. I remain in awe.

We are a part of the Bride of Christ, as testified to by Isaiah 54:5, Matthew 25:1-13, 2 Corinthians 11:2, Ephesians 5:25-27 and 32, and Revelation 19:7-9.

We, like the rest of the Body of Christ, are His ambassadors (2 Corinthians 5:17-20; Matthew 28:18-20; etc.).

We are a part of the redeemed!! Thanks be to God!! (See Psalm 107:1-3, Isaiah 43:1 and 44:22, Luke 1:68, John 3:16-18, Romans 5:8, Galatians 3:13, Ephesians 1:17, Colossians 1:12-14, Titus 2:11-14, 1 Peter 1:17-19, and Revelation 5:8-10 among other passages).

Like a multiplicity of other Scriptures that testify to the following, Ephesians 2:19-22 so beautifully reminds us, “So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints, and are of God’s household, having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the corner stone, in whom the whole building, being fitted together, is growing into a holy temple in the Lord, in whom you also are being built together into a dwelling of God in the Spirit.”

Fellow citizens with the saints… of God’s household… of His dwelling place…

Does that shield us from the “curveballs” of life? Ha! Nope!

We, as a part of the Body of Christ, must be ready at all times for even that.

I was just now reminded of that again, because, literally, as I was writing this a few minutes ago, our doorbell rang, well… unexpectedly.

It was one of our neighbors. This particular neighbor had never been to our door before. She was in tears. She told us that her adult son had unexpectedly passed away a few weeks ago, and that she is in need of a ride somewhere so as to take care of some personal business, and asked if we would please do that for her. She said she knew that she could call on us. We stopped and sat with her. We listened as she poured her heart out. We grieved with her. We rejoiced with her when she said that her son loved Jesus and was now with Him. We loved on her, and when she calls in a few minutes to say that she’s ready to run her errand, we’ll be honored to give her the ride she’s requested.

That, friends, is the Lord’s own doing.

He’s made His people to be “salt” and “light” (Matthew 5:13-16). We, His people, are His very own servants. We all get to love on others for His sake, and they, too, can come to know Him themselves; and those who already do know Him will find Him among us: us, firmly rooted in His presence, and therefore, Him, graciously inhabiting ours. We are His people. We’re not some innocuous “group.” We are, individually and together, of His Body! And so it is written, “Grace and peace be multiplied to you in the knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord, for His divine power has granted to us everything pertaining to life and godliness, through the true knowledge of Him who called us by His own glory and excellence. Through these He has granted to us His precious and magnificent promises, so that by them you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world on account of lust” (2 Peter 1:2-4).

Imagine that!!!

We’re co-laborers with Christ, God’s fellow workers, His field, His building, His temple… all that packed into 1 Corinthians 3: 9-11. And we’re so very much more! But since this is a post and not a book, I’ll let that be enough for now. 😊

One last thing, though, family:

Remember the story of “The Ugly Duckling” by Hans Christian Andersen?

What everyone thought to be a duckling (and a very ugly one at that!) turned out to be “the most beautiful of all the birds.” It was never ever a duckling, ugly or otherwise! It had been of a completely different species all along! It had always been… a swan! It’s just that neither the swan, nor anyone else, had realized that.

What about us?

Will we, like the swan of Andersen’s story in its earlier years, allow ourselves to be mistaken for something other than the beautiful ἐκκλησίαι that Jesus has created us to be? Will we allow an evil world, or our own carnal thoughts and shabby, inaccurate, completely inadequate opinions (or those of others) to tell us that we’re something far different than who we really are in Him?

Or will we listen to our Lord and Master who plainly declares from Genesis to Revelation the truth of who we are, how we came to be, why we are who we are, and truly Whose we are by His own doing and for His own delightful purposes?

Will we acknowledge what He Himself has built and is Himself continuing to build, or will we persist in calling it something far different than He does… with increasingly disastrous results?

If we don’t know who we truly are— as dictated only by our God who has revealed that in and through the written Word, and in and through the Word Who took on flesh and tabernacled among us— then we’ll never function as such.

And that’s a huge deal.

The thoughts above are from my good friend Victoria Holt. Sign up below for my bi-monthly newsletter so you don’t miss a post.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Thoughts from Others

We Are Broken

From my friend Reed Merino

You are guilty – and you don’t even KNOW it – if you are content to be a DENOMINATIONAL Christian!

If I am successful then when you have finished reading this essay you will feel a hefty dose of guilt and anger – hopefully, not at me, but at both yourself and your congregation or denomination.

On the very last day in which He could be with His beloved disciples, He introduced them to the covenant meal through which He was going to fulfill His promise to be in their midst. He then entered into the most passionate and intense prayer that is recorded within the Scriptures; listen to it with your heart:

“Jesus spoke these things, raising His eyes to Heaven and saying:

‘Father, the hour has come! Glorify Your Son, so that Your Son also may glorify You, just as You gave Him authority over all humanity, so that He will give eternal life to all those whom You have given Him. Now eternal life is this: that they may know You, the only true God, and the One whom You sent – Jesus Christ. I have glorified You on the earth. I have finished the work that You have given me to do. So now, Father, You glorify me by Your side with the glory that I had along with You before the world existed!’

‘I have revealed Your name to the men whom You have given me out of the world. They were Yours and You gave them to me, and they have kept Your word. They now know that everything You have given to me is from You; because I have given them the sayings which You have given to me; and they have received and known for sure that I came forth from You, and they have believed that You sent me. I am praying for them; I am not praying for the world but for those whom You have given me, because they are yours. Actually, all my things are Yours and Yours are mine, and I have been glorified in them. Now I am no longer in the world, yet these are in the world, and I am coming to You.’

‘Holy Father, keep them in Your name which You have given to me, SO THAT THEY MAY BE ONE JUST AS WE ARE. While I was with them in the world I kept them in Your name. I protected those whom You gave me, and not one of them was lost except the son of perdition, so that the Scripture might be fulfilled. But now I am coming to You, and I speak these things in the world so that they may have my joy made full in them.’

‘I have given them Your word; and the world has hated them because they are not of the world, just as I am not of the world. I am not asking that You take them out of the world, but that You keep them from the evil one. They are not of the world, just as I am not of the world. Sanctify them by Your truth; Your word is truth. Just as You sent me into the world, I also have sent them into the world. And for their sakes I sanctify myself, so that they also may be sanctified in truth.’

‘I pray not only for these, but also for those who believe into me through their word; [that is you and me!] that they ALL MAY BE ONE, JUST AS YOU, FATHER, ARE IN ME AND I IN YOU; that in Us they also may be one, SO THAT THE WORLD MAY BELIEVE THAT YOU SENT ME. In fact, the glory that You gave to me I have given to them, so that THEY MAY BE ONE JUST AS WE ARE ONE: I in them and You in me, so that they may be perfected into one; also SO THAT THE WORLD MAY KNOW THAT YOU SENT ME AND HAVE LOVED THEM JUST AS YOU HAVE LOVED ME.’

‘Father, those whom You have given to me, I desire that they also may be with me where I am, so that they may observe my glory, which You have given me, because You loved me before the founding of the world. Righteous Father! Indeed the world has not known You, but I have known You; and these have known that You sent me. Yes, I have made Your name known to them and will make it known, so that the love with which You have loved me may be in them, and I in them.’ (John 17) When he had said these things, Jesus went out with his disciples across the Kidron Valley. There was an orchard there, and he and his disciples went into it.” [And it was in that Garden that He sweat in such passion prayer that, “being in agony, He was praying very fervently; and His sweat became like drops of blood, falling down upon the ground” (Luke 22:44)].

We are broken

If you have let His “bloody sweat” prayer penetrate into your heart, and stir up your own motivations, then you cannot but help being aware of just HOW IMPORTANT it was, and still is to Him that we who consider ourselves to be “Christians” be united in our affection for one another, in faithfully passing on His teachings together, and in our ability to decide and function as one in our decision making. As Paul also pleaded: “Now I PLEAD with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all SPEAK the same thing, and that there be NO DIVISIONS among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the SAME MIND and in the SAME JUDGMENT” (1 Corinthians 1:10; by “same mind and in the same judgment,” I understand Paul to be saying, “same theory and same practice”). How much time do you take thinking, praying, and yearning for that to happen?

Whether you have IN FACT received the same Spirit into Him that He had received in His baptism is demonstrated by whether there is a recognizable movement going on within you that was so clearly within Him – a movement that is drawing you into a passion for union with other disciples of Jesus that is the very same intimate union that Jesus and His Father have: “ONE JUST AS WE ARE.” Do you even recognize within you a DESIRE for that kind of unity with the fellow members of your own congregation, let alone among all of your fellow fragmented Christians?

If you cannot recognize that desire within your heart, do you realize what that is telling you about the real nature of your loyalty, love, and trust in Jesus? If it is not motivating your prayer and your actions, it means that your “personal relationship with Jesus” is not as personal or as real as you may think. To be “in Christ” certainly must mean that you yearn for what was and is within His heart to be within your heart, no?

That kind of loving unity has never EXISTED within the unregenerated people of planet Earth! And, to Jesus, that unity for which He prayed, endured the agony of bloody sweat, and poured out His life’s blood – that unity was SO important that it was a key way by which, “the world may KNOW that you sent me and HAVE loved them just as you have loved me.” Do you understand the gravity of the fragmentation of what Christianity has become? – “so that the WORLD MAY KNOW that you sent me AND HAVE LOVED THEM just as you have loved me”! Your “fragments” are power testimony that God does NOT love them in the way that the Father loves His Son!

Blinded by the light?

But despite how much we all may be proclaiming to God how much we love Him and want to please Him and spread His holy Gospel – here we are, FUNCTIONALLY split up into hundreds and hundreds of splintered and competitive fragments. Our theologians can wax clever and eloquent about how all who are “born again” are members of His “one church.” But the world is less deceived than our theologians! They can see how “seriously” WE take that Book that we want THEM to read! And if they ever do decide to “go to church” they know that no matter what kind of lifestyle they prefer to embrace they can find a “church” to suite their taste.

And the horrible tragedy is that you who are reading this probably do not really know within your own heart what Jesus was verbally pouring out through His heart! You probably do not feel the horrible effect that the very existence of your own denominational fragment is having on the cause of Christ – or how easy your fragment is making it for Satan to convince his citizens to ignore you! Neither you nor your church elders or your pastor are probably engaged in any heartfelt prayer – let along actions – to explore with other sincere “Bible believing Christians” how you might overcome your differences of “theory and practice” and fulfill the deep desire of the Man that you claim is your “Lord and Savior.”

Your denomination, whether consisting of hundreds of congregations or just one, is an affront to God, a scandal that demeans the name of Jesus, the Son of the Most High God! Your denomination is a broken off fragment of the holy movement that Jesus created and called “My Church.” You Methodists, or Baptists, or Presbyterians, Lutherans and Anglicans are a broken-off fragment that advertises itself as an adequate representation of the whole, like trying to sell an animal with no legs and advertising it as a horse, or advertising a machine with no propeller and wings as an airplane. And the Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox are no better – they were the ones who BEGAN that fragmentation! And no matter HOW different your denominations are from one another each of you feels that you have the right to call yourself a “church of Jesus Christ.” And, if you are loyal to your denomination then you may well assume that all the other denominations should quit being who they are and join your denomination. And if you think that your “non-denominational church” claim exempts you from this charge, you will find that God merely looks at you as a rebellious group that is so unable to become one with others – so extremely fragmented – as to have become a one-church denomination!

The reason that you are content to remain in your denominational fragments is not because you have problems with their people and their people’s theology and actions nearly as much as because you have problems with Jesus! You do not love Him as much in your heart as you do on paper. If you loved Him and were as personally loyal to Him as you may think you are, then you would have His passion that poured out through His prayer!

Jesus’s passion for His children to be one flock is obvious. If you do not share His passion then why do you think that you are one of his children? His Spirit – animated children are motivated to be loyal to Him, so as to let HIS priorities become their priorities, His passions their passions.

If you are a true lover of what God defines as “good” then you will always be looking for what is good – ANYWHERE you can find it, but especially from other sincere followers of Jesus. But if you are merely – as God judges you – a lover of your denominational tribe then you are content to focus largely on where your tribe is superior to the other tribes: and the tragedy that Satan created just continues.

So: what are you going to do about it?

You can learn more about Reed and his books by going to reedmerino.com.

You can subscribe to my newsletter below.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Books / Videos

Micro-Church Revolution!

I’m not recommending the book Micro-Church Revolution! by Rick Vincent. I’m not sure who would benefit from this book. For an added fee, you can go online and purchase 49 templates including; Purchase Statement Worksheet, Fundraising Strategy Worksheet, Meal Planner Template and a slew of others that all seem unnecessary and overly time consuming. It doesn’t appear this book was birthed from actually doing life together.

To receive my bi-monthly blogs sign up below.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Books / Videos

The Freedom to Love

It is so important for the Ekklesia to model true community, but how do we get there? The Servant Community by Art Mealer helps guide us in the right direction. I’m so encouraged as this work acts as a bridge, moving from the structural dos and don’ts to the inner motivations of our hearts and spirits. The excerpt below examines how we should love one another.

“A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another [notice, not love the lost, but love the saints]: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know [including the lost] that you are my disciples if you have love for one another.” -John 13:34-35

This new command will not bring us life-Jesus brings us life-but it will bring us freedom. Jesus previously explained that all the commandments hang on loving God (as detailed in the first four commandments) and loving our neighbor (as presented in the following six commandments). These tell us about God’s values and personality. “Loving others as he loves us” emphasizes not another law, nor a quantitative “love as much as Jesus loved,” but a qualitatively new kind of love. The love Jesus has been exercising was generated by His determined choice apart from the worthiness of its object. Jesus manifests a love unconstrained by eligibility requirements, showing us a new way of loving each other.

In beginning and maintaining relationships, we do not ask the prudent and self-protective question, “Does this person deserve my love?” We look at Jesus, and the apostle John redirects our position,“Beloved, if God so loved us, we also ought to love one another.” -I John 4:11

Our question becomes, “Do I owe this person my love?” and that question is forever answered, “Yes.” Yes, if I am to love as Jesus loved. We are freed from assessing the worthiness of another. Love’s
privilege and obligation stand apart from such evaluations. We follow the example of the one whose love without boundaries willingly led him to the shame and suffering of that awful cross. On our behalf. We like the benefit, but not the cost. And we learn love costs. So, in practice, we can be a petty people. We forgive, but just so far-we keep count.

However, as forgiveness stands without measure in Christ’s community, we needfully extend each other a “seven-times-seventy” love. Why? Because that is how he loves us. Because as members of His community, we are to live in relationally close quarters. Nowhere to hide and nurse our petulant pride. Choosing to do so, we move beyond superficial politeness to where inevitable irritations and provocations expose our own imperfections. Rather than eroding our care for one another, these interpersonal abrasions train us to love beyond natural love. It is necessary to develop a kind and patient love that endures and “covers a multitude of sins.” Finding we are loved when we are unlovely is the humbling power of the new love Jesus commanded. The old love, based on merit, breeds pride in ourselves and leads us to find fault in others; fault found, we indulge our tendency for self-protection and self-promotion. Discord ensues. But now we are freed from that trap; what wounds come to us we endure with grace; our love grows, and what failings others may or may not have become irrelevant.

The apostle Paul needfully advises us in his letter to the Ephesians, “Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and perpetual animosity, resentment, strife, fault-finding and slander be put away from you, along with every kind of spitefulness, verbal abuse, and malevolence.” -Ephesians 1:31, (Amplified Version).

If we dwell on how badly we believe someone has behaved towards us, we will struggle to love and forgive as Christ commanded. We do, on occasion, deeply wound each other. Sometimes we falsely imagine wounds or fail to acknowledge they were unintended. The resultant feelings of hurt and betrayal can be overwhelming. And there lies another qualitative difference in loving as Jesus loves us. A recipient of God’s grace ought to be gracious to others.

This new love instructs us to turn our mental rehearsals away from how we were treated and toward how God has treated us. His graciousness is our meditation through each day, where he lifts from us each mistake, each failure, each opening sin finds for our affection. We are aware of God’s forgiveness, which demands forgiveness of our trespassers, just as God’s love demands we love others. Recounting the privilege we enjoy, enfolded as we are in undeserved love and unbounded forgiveness, we find our wounds are not so deep. Like waking from a bad dream and realizing nothing was real, our tightly held injury fades like an illusion. Left in its place is the unique joy of freedom from demanding justice.

But If circumstances require it, the love of Jesus further invites us to put ourselves to death-the very opposite of our instinct for self- protection. Whatever happens, we become free to follow him in loving others as he has loved us: accepting, welcoming, and forgiving one another. Paul continues, “Be kind and helpful to one another, tender-hearted, compassionate, understanding, forgiving one another readily and freely, just as God in Christ also forgave you.” -Ephesians 1:32 (Amplified Version)

Isn’t this a grace none of us are worthy of receiving, but we all desperately need, not only from God but from each other?

Jesus assures us that our love for one another-in the way Jesus loved us-is the clear and unmistakable hallmark of our being His disciples. The resulting unity and harmony confirm that Jesus came from the Father. This living proof, written in the epistles of our hearts, reaches across national and cultural boundaries to everyone in every language as people see God manifested in His people.

Sign up below to receive my bi-monthly newsletter.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Thoughts from Others

A Boy Scout and a Marine

From my friend Reed Merino

The Importance Of The Church: God’s Kingdom Among Men!

There is no need more urgent on our planet than that apostolic Christianity should be restored. Considering the desperate conditions that exist on this planet, that is a bold statement indeed! Poverty and hunger, suicidal loneliness, political and racial hatreds, people slipping over the brink into insanity, families disintegrating: can the establishment of a “religious” organization really be more important than the resolution of those wretched conditions? Properly understood, the answer is a resounding “yes!”

And I do not say this lightly: decades ago, I knew what it was like to fear that suicide might be the only alternative to a total breakdown. And perhaps like you, during the course of my life of eight decades, I have known loneliness to the point of tears; I have felt the fear of failure and have known deep anxiety about whether I might “go under” financially. Yet I still say that there is no need more urgent than that the Christianity of Christ and His apostles should be restored. You see, if the churches were to enter into the Biblical teaching and obedience described in the following chapters, she would provide a form of human society within which none of those wretched conditions mentioned above would ever need exist again!

We humans have many basic needs, and even more subtle ones. God’s design for His redeemed children is that we satisfy those needs not simply as individuals, or even as families, or even as the typical “church,” but as the tightly knit communities of disciples of Jesus that are described within the New Testament. Hear this, Christian: Christ in His church is God’s solution to all human needs and problems, not just its [supposedly] “religious” ones! Governments down through the ages have addressed, with varying degrees of seriousness and various degrees of success, what they considered to be the pressing problems of man. Sadly, history shows us that they have never been able to provide an adequate solution to those problems; and there are no grounds for believing that such an inability will ever change. Within the society of the Church of Christ (and only in His Church) there is indeed such a solution: a solution that actually used to exist, and a solution that God intends to restore!

The church described in the New Testament is not simply a center of worship and “religious” actions. God’s idea of “religion that is pure and undefiled” (James 1:27) includes much more than our usual categories of “religion.” God’s kingdom is not a formless mass of individuals whose belief and practice are carried out in private; nor is it the loose-knit association that gathers together a few times a week for “religious” activity, such as is characterized by Christendom’s Christianity. When the Kingdom of God is manifested on the earth, a visible society is created. As created by God, the church is that society of regenerated humans who have accepted Jesus as the divinely appointed ruler of the entire race of man. Her charter is to demonstrate how the entire race of humans could function if they yielded to the authority and the Spirit of God’s Anointed One. His church is the sphere where God’s plans for the “total man” and for every aspect of human society are accomplished. Indeed, the church is the true form of human society!-such is her call; such is what is necessarily implied in being “Christ’s body” (1 Corinthians 12:27 NASB)), “the pillar and support of the truth” (1 Timothy 3:15), “a chosen race,…a holy nation,…the people of God” (1 Peter 2:9-10 NASB).

Blueprint for a Revolution by Reed Merino

Think of the kind of conditions which had to have existed in the apostolic church in order for it to be instinctively described by them as a “body,” a “race,” a “nation” and a “people.” Most of us contemporary Christians are so used to reading those terms and so used to thoughtlessly and invalidly applying them to our forms of Christianity that we fail to see the obvious-that theological “ignored elephant in the living room”: they are terms that can only be applied to a group of people that is very tightly knit together. Can you honestly apply those terms to whatever group of Christians to which you now belong? Are the members of your congregation so tightly knit together that all of you function in this world as one organism, one body? Is your congregation’s community life so complete-so mutually committed to one another’s well-being, and so well organized to enable all of you to survive and flourish in all aspects of life-that you find the term “nation” a natural way to describe yourselves? I suspect not. Yet those were the very terms that came to the apostles’ inspired minds when they sought to describe the church they knew. The difference between their Christianity and what we have gotten used to calling Christianity is profound, Pilgrim!

If a member of an apostolic brotherhood were to suddenly find him or herself in one of Christendom’s congregations today, what differences do you think they would detect? They would notice significant differences in doctrine, worship, and organization, to be sure. But I suspect they would be most distressed because of another difference they would quickly sense. It is a difference like the difference between marriage and casual dating: the difference between an intimate, life- long 
relationship of people who have “all things in common” (Acts 2:44), versus a 
“meaningful relationship” that serves merely to take the edge off of our loneliness 
and to enable us to have some enjoyable and creative times together. It is a 
difference like the difference between the U.S. Marines and the Boy Scouts of 
America: the difference between a brotherhood whose way of life effectively 
prepares its members to march right into the jaws of death together, versus one that 
exists primarily to provide nice bonding times together. It is a difference like the 
difference between theater and reality: between “make believe” and “is.” That is 
how far the Christianity we know has been removed from the reality called 
“apostolic Christianity,” the Christianity described in the New Testament, and 
manifested for some centuries.


Contemporary Christianity is not even living a way of life that is up to the 
standards of ancient Israel, and yet we who think that we are followers of Jesus 
tend to think that we can look down upon them as our legalistic and primitive 
spiritual inferiors! To see current ecclesiastical organizations calling themselves a 
valid manifestation of “Christ’s Church,” but who have lost both the vision and the 
heart to “put their money where their mouth is” is somewhat like the way we would feel if we saw a really crack company of Marine soldiers marching and 
tossing and spinning their bayonetted rifles with awesome precision and elegance-only to learn that they had quit using their weapons for actual combat and had 
given up actually fighting their nation’s enemies!


Are you willing to happily pay the price to become an individual member of His 
Church?


Let me know if you are!



You can learn more about Reed and his books by going to reedmerino.com.

You can subscribe to my newsletter below.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Books / Videos

A New Family

Strange Religion by Nijay K. Gupta, is an excellent book, well documented and insightful. It gives you a glimpse of how unique and strange our Christian faith was (and is), as it influenced Roman and Jewish culture. Although not specifically about house church, I would highly recommend this work. This is the second excerpt concerning family.

We noted already that Caecilius, the critic of Christianity, mentioned how weird it was that Christians called each other “brother” and “sister” and shared ritual kisses at night in the privacy of houses. You can see how rumors might spread, and people would naturally ask questions. But this tells us a lot about how Christians thought of each other-namely, as family. In the Roman world, family was the most important building block for society. As the family thrived, so did the whole empire. And the opposite was true: if the family was disorderly and chaotic, this would shake the very foundation of society. Many viewed the household as a microcosm of the empire and the empire as a macro-version of the household. This is well stated by ancient Jewish philosopher Philo of Alexandria: “A household is a city on a small and contracted scale, and the management of a household is a contracted kind of polity; so that a city may be called a large house, and the government of a city a widely spread [household] economy…The manager of a household and the governor of a state are identical, though the multitude and magnitude of the things committed to their charge are different” (On the Life of Joseph 1.38, 39).

The earliest Christians were intentionally deconstructing a Romanized approach to family and constructing a new family and household. This was dangerous business, fiddling with the building blocks of civilization, but this became the primary way Christians saw their relationship to one another. Now, that didn’t mean they broke away from blood ties and abandoned their spouses. But their family in Christ was meant to take priority in shaping their identity, and this way of thinking started with Jesus.

We can begin with Jesus’s own question about family in the Gospel of Matthew. Someone tells Jesus while he is teaching that his mother and brothers are trying to get closer to him. Jesus takes this simple remark and opens up a big can of worms about who counts as family: “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?…Here are my mother and my brothers!” (12:48-49). Jesus is pointing to his disciples and explaining that “whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother” (12:50). In the Gospel of John, a similar kind of family-shifting statement is made by Jesus after he has been resurrected. When Mary Magdalene realizes she is talking to Jesus, she wants to cling to him, but he tells her, “Do not hold on to me, because I have not yet ascended to the Father. But go to my brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God”” (John 20:17). Jesus the Son has a natural connection to the heavenly Father that he wants to share with all who follow him, who abide in the Son.

Since Jesus talked about forming a new family, it was natural for the early churches to gather in homes and treat each other as family. This family-type behavior is reinforced in many early Christian texts in several ways. One of the titles most used of God is “Father,” signaling the protective and caregiving nature of God and also the idea that all these people are equal children of one Father. Jesus is God’s one true Son, and all believers find their place in this new family through the sonship of Christ. Paul uses this imagery when writing to the Roman churches: “For those whom [God] foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn within a large family” (Rom. 8:29).

Jesus the Son is the living spiritual DNA link between believers and God the Father. He graciously opens up his sonship to include a massive new family. In Roman families, while there was a natural sense of care and concern for one another, there was also a tiered structure that involved different levels of importance for different members. Generally speaking, men were more important than women, older more important than younger, pure blood more privileged than half siblings, let alone slaves. Slaves were counted within households, but they did not “count” as people. They had no family name, no honor, no inheritance, no future; basically, they were living forms of property, much like cattle. But Christian writers like Paul ascribed dignity and honor to all within the household of faith, including slaves. The redemption made possible by Jesus the Son enables everyone to be included in God’s family, with the same welcome status as Jesus himself, no more, no less; just as Jesus the true Son cried, “Abba! Father!” so any child of God can say the same through Jesus’s privilege and the Spirit’s power (Gal. 4:1-7). This is the context for Paul’s famous equality statement: “As many of you as were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female; for all of you are one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heir according to the promise” (3:28-29).

The social effect that this would have had on the Christian communities is massive. Joseph Hellerman explains that in the ancient world households held to certain standards and embodied a special ethos. First, there was a strong sense of commitment. Families were there for each other through thick and thin. Second, they worked together as a team. Often, families were like small businesses, everyone having to play their part for the benefit of the whole. This would complement Paul’s member/body language and imagery. Family members exercised their gifts and skills to support the whole household. Third, families shared resources and possessions. Real brothers and sisters would often share clothes, tools, furniture, and money, among other things. This is precisely the vision that is cast in the book of Acts about the way of the church, a sharing community where everyone pooled material resources for the common good (Acts 4:32-35). Finally, families loved each other. Sharing and working together was hard work, but it was not just business. It began, ended, and was carried out because of mutual affection and real concern for one another. Precisely when Paul detects that the Philippian church is showing fractures in their community, he prays for love (Phil. 1:9-11), which is what family is meant to reflect.

It may not have happened right away, but pretty quickly in the development of early Christianity, believers saw each other as family, and they met in homes to worship together and model generous community, worshiping the true God of home and world.

Sign up below to receive my bi-monthly newsletter.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Books / Videos

Dinner Parties

Strange Religion by Nijay K. Gupta, is an excellent book, well documented and insightful. It gives you a glimpse of how unique and strange our Christian faith was (and is), as it influenced Roman and Jewish culture. Although not specifically about house church, I would highly recommend this work. I’ll post two excerpts; this is the first one concerning eating together.

A common tradition in Roman society was holding dinner parties, based on the Greek symposium, which brought together not only family but also neighbors and various friends and associates. While this event involved food and drink, it would be a mistake to consider eating to be the focus. Rather, it was a social event that reflected the host’s social values and reminded those present (and absent) where they sat on the spectrum of importance. Warren Carter explains that these meals “underlined social stratification. Guests were seated according to different quantities and qualities of food in different quality tableware.” The ancient philosopher Plutarch explains that the goal of investing in one of these often lavish dinner parties is not just to eat and drink but to be seen eating and drinking with certain people.

In the house’s triclinium (dining room), the most privileged guests would recline closest to the food. Less important guests would be seated further away, and women and children, if present, would be positioned even further from the food. Plutarch describes these house-party banquets as “a spectacle and a show,” with more important guests being given closer viewing of the entertainment (like singers, musicians, and dancers), proximity to the delicious smells, and service that would ensure the food was still warm. Sometimes the privileges were so formalized that certain special seats were permanently reserved for guests of honor. While this tiered experience was most overt and noticeable among the elite,” it was also the norm among commoners. This reflects the essence of Romanness, a constant reinforcement of social values in Roman culture: social life was set up as a pyramid of power. There were a precious few “haves” and a lot of “have-nots,” and there was no use in pretending that everyone was equal.

Jesus did things quite differently and paved the way for a new social ethos, which could and had to be demonstrated at the dinner table. In fact, it was a common criticism of Jesus by his contemporaries that he openly shared the social table with “tax collectors and sinners” (Matt. 9:11; Mark 2:16; see also Luke 15:2). Luke tells the story of Jesus offending a Pharisee who hosts him for dinner. A stranger, a woman, makes her way into the house and washes Jesus’s feet with her tears and covers them in expensive ointment. With even a basic understanding of Roman dinner etiquette, it is clear that this woman breaks major social boundaries. Not only does Jesus ignore this infringement, but he commends her for her love and care for him. And then Jesus turns the tables on Simon, his host: “I entered your house; you gave me no water for my feet, but she has bathed my feet with her tears and dried them with her hair. You gave me no kiss, but from the time I came in she has not stopped kissing my feet. You did not anoint my head with oil, but she has anointed my feet with ointment” (Luke 7:44-47). When I heard this story as a teenager, I just assumed that Simon, in his excitement about having Jesus over, forgot these hospitality gestures. But the more I learn about how these dinners sent signals of status and importance, I can’t help but think Simon was purposefully putting Jesus in his place as an inferior. Jesus cuts through the social games and says in effect, “This woman wants to be a caring host, but you (Simon) want to be an important host.”

The point Jesus is making to Simon the Pharisee is reinforced in Jesus’s parable of the dinner party. A certain man, Jesus teaches, plans a big party and invites his friends and associates. A slave goes out with personal invitations. One by one, each guest makes some excuse for why they can’t be there. Let’s say he invites eight couples, and each one thinks they are too good for this man; they want to remind him he is not that important to them. So, what does he do? He tells his slave to forget the invitations and go out to the streets and bring in the poor, the blind, and the lame-the people at the very bottom of society. And rather than host just a dozen of his supposed friends, he tells his slave to fill up his whole house with anyone and everyone who wants to taste his fine cuisine (Luke 14:15-24).

It’s hard for us to appreciate just how unusual a decision this would be. In order to “translate” Jesus’s parable into Western society, we might think of it as a fancy fundraiser dinner event. You make lots of preparations, decorate the house, make elaborate and expensive invitations, and then you invite all your friends and associates. And imagine that every single one of them sends you the signal that they are too busy and important to come to your little gathering. So what do you do then? You take all those fancy cupcakes and the chocolate-fondue fountain and the cedar-plank salmon and the champagne, and you go out into the streets and hand these delicacies to any stranger nearby, including a child riding a tricycle, some homeless people, and an immigrant street vendor. What an odd thing to do, right?

Jesus’s parable is a response to his anger at how guests at a dinner he is attending fought over the seats of honor (Luke 14:7). He turns this occasion into a teaching moment, saying in essence, “Don’t push and shove your way into the spotlight, but choose the lowest place, because God’s kingdom works differently than mortal kingdoms, ‘For all who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted’” (14:10-11).

But old habits die hard, and we find in some Christian churches of the first century that Jesus’s message was difficult to swallow. We find a clear case in the Corinthian church. Paul chastises them for turning the sacred Lord’s Supper meal into a competitive dinner party: “When you come together, it is not really to eat the Lord’s supper. For when the time comes to eat, each of you goes ahead with your own supper, and one goes hungry and another becomes drunk. What! Do you not have homes to eat and drink in? Or do you show contempt for the church of God and humiliate those who have nothing?” (1 Cor. 11:20-22).

Paul warns them that they must learn how to discern “the body,” the church as a living organism that must live in unity rather than rivalry (1 Cor. 11:29). “So then, my brothers and sisters, when you come together to eat, wait for one another. If you are hungry, eat at home, so that when you come together, it will not be for your condemnation” (11:33-34). It is no coincidence that he calls them “brothers and sisters” here. Paul is reinforcing the family identity of this community. Family shares. Family participates for the sake of the whole.

The Corinthian church is evidence that not all churches lived out Jesus’s vision of status indifference. Not all churches let their new family identity take root. But the ideal was that those who willingly entered this community would join a special household of God. This would be unlike any other kind of household they knew. No one was of more importance or lesser importance in this family. Because of the invitation of Jesus the Son, each participant was simply “brother” or “sister.” That cast a bold vision that would have been powerfully compelling, especially to “the least of these” (Matt. 25:40).

Sign up for my bi-monthly newsletters below.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Books / Videos

No Escape

When The Church Was Very Young by Graham Wood is a short work, 70 pages, and compares practices of the early ekklesia with what we see today. It covers the major themes and has multiple quotes from other notable authors. The short excerpt below talks about the challenges of the institutional church pastor. Published in 2025, you can get a copy from Amazon and contact the author at grahamwood32@yahoo.co.uk.

Finally a word needs to be said about the pastor himself. There is no question that most enter their ministerial role with high motivation and desire to serve the Lord and his people. Like their fellow Christians some are gifted in just one way but not in others-perhaps an ability to reach people with the gospel but perhaps not other gifts of shepherding or of communicating. But the point is they enter a system, one which is demanding and inexorable in long-established expectations by their congregations of what a pastor should be for them. For many that points to something of an omnicompetent role.

This system admits of no escape, and as many others have pointed out, this carries with it burdens and responsibilities which are too much for one man to fulfil or to bear. In such cases it is rare for the system itself to be questioned as a contributing factor as it should be, and the tensions which the pastor experiences, such as the demands made by the mandatory weekly sermon, and the spiritual battle he may be waging alone must inevitably play a part which are largely hidden from the people, and very often only known by a wife or immediate family. Thus the oft repeated and sad result ending in clergy ‘burn-out’ and departure. It is also the system itself which in practice denies the pastor the benefits and encouragements provided by the mutual ministries of the many ‘one anothers’ which the NT describes. The loneliness of those within such situations is itself tragic and unnecessary.

For all of these reasons the tradition should be dismantled, so providing the wider ministry of the body of Christ opportunity to function as the norm for ministry.

There are many other problems associated with the single pastor role and the clergy/laity divide which cannot be touched on here, such as the place of ordination, of hierarchy, of professionalism, and not least the anomalies presented by a state church system, all of which emphasise the decided shift from a multi-faceted body ministry to ‘officer-centred’ ministry.

John Howard Yoder summarises the contrasting position well:

“The conclusion is inescapable that the multiplicity of ministries is not a mere adiaphoron, (Indifferent or unimportant), a happenstance of only superficial significance, but a specific work of grace, and a standard for the church” (Article: “The Fulness of Christ’ – Searching Together).

Sign up for my bi-monthly newsletter below.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

Categories
Thoughts from Others

Let’s Find Out

The Early Ekklesia’s Anatomy vs. The Modern-Day Church

Let’s find out.

This article is from my friend Buff Scott, Jr. You can find out more about Buff, sign up for his newsletter or download his three books by clicking here.

When we reflect upon the early ekklesia and compare it to the contemporary church, we can easily see how widely separated they are.  A great gulf lies between them. The early ekklesia was not composed of sects, denominations, churches, or religious parties. Except for the “petite” factions at Corinth (1 Cor. 1:12-13), religious parties were non-existent within the universal body of believers. God’s colony of redeemed sinners functioned as a humane and evangelistic community. Their meetings were informal but orderly, serious and alive, responsive, and mutually managed. Ours are “services,” as at a funeral, largely non-responsive and non-stimulating. 

Is it time to grow up?

Pew-warmers have little or no recourse except to sit silently and be indoctrinated by an elitist. As a result of inactivity and lack of mutual participation, commoners experience little or no spiritual growth. As growth is stifled, most remain spiritual adolescents. Elitists who run the show have been hired for a salary and can be fired by “stepping over the line” and speaking things “contrary to the Word of God,” which, when translated, means to turn a little to the right or to the left of the party’s doctrinal platform. The doctrinal platform is the various conceptions of  the “Word of God” held by those who keep the Corporation running smoothly, such as dictatorial Elders, Pastors, Priests, or Church Boards.    
  
It is strikingly clear that the early meetings were bereft of pulpits, collections to buy and maintain flashy edifices and to keep an elite orator vocationally afloat, ritualistic nonsense, and pew-sitters. Their environment was family-like. Our gatherings resemble formal business meetings, where business or “worship” doesn’t begin until the hands on the clock are at a certain crossroads. Our overall anatomy mirrors a Corporation, an Institution, not a compassionate community of concerned ones.
 
What dissimilarity! We have retrogressed, not progressed. We have traded the holy for the common, the celestial for the terrestrial, the spiritual for the materialistic, the sacred for the plain. Yet there are many receptive and seeking hearts within the corridors of the modern church. God will deliver them, if they are willing to remove their soiled garments and replace them with garments of reconciliation. His children no longer need wallow in the partisan litter of the Religious Establishment, for God will raise up reformers to rescue His elect. He always has. He always will.
 
But it isn’t likely He will penetrate the divisive armor of those whose  hearts  are solidly enslaved by the Institutional church, and whose deep-seated infirmity is “Mad Church Disease.” The divisive spirit is a work of our carnal nature. It is reflected thusly, “We are right and others are wrong. We are the only church Jesus founded.”
  
As long as this separatist spirit lingers within the contemporary church, she will never be able to apply a healing balm to “Mad Church Disease.” Freedom in Jesus will always escape those who parrot this mindset and exhibit a cliquish spirit. It is indeed a rarity to find freedom in the contemporary church. The reason is that the party line must be parroted, her precepts supported, her traditions preserved, and the “church system” idolized. If we veer a little to the right or lean a little to the left, we will soon be verbally disciplined and told to shape up or ship out-or worse.
 
This is not freedom. It is bondage. To find a man who is truly free to speak his mind and heart while employed by a church is like looking for shelter in a hailstorm. Even pew-sitting peasants are not allowed the freedom to speak their heart and mind without ecclesiastical reprisal. There are, however, many receptive and loving hearts who are caught up in the web of partisan religion. They need to be freed.
              
But to be truly free in Jesus we need to cast off our partisan shackles and disavow all sectarian systems-that is, all religious parties that have subjugated us. This I have personally done. This I will not undo. No church or religious party upon the face of planet Earth has one bit of control over my life, my mind, or my beliefs any longer. I will no longer be a bondservant to any of them. My only Master is Jesus-and He alone. I will forever be His slave. I refuse to bow to any other. “Give me freedom or give me death” will  always be my cry. For without freedom to think, to dissent, to investigate, and to question, our walk with the Lord and voyage to Heaven might be difficult to negotiate. In 1973, I composed a poem which contains this verse:

Come, now, my fellow believers,
Consider the divisive infirmities of each other;
And how they can be reversed and set asunder,
By offering our love and helping one another.


You can sign up for my bi-monthly newsletter below.

Subscribe

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp